Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon SAP-C02 Exam - Topic 2 Question 62 Discussion

A company uses AWS CloudFormation to deploy applications within multiple VPCs that are all attached to a transit gateway Each VPC that sends traffic to the public internet must send the traffic through a shared services VPC Each subnet within a VPC uses the default VPC route table and the traffic is routed to the transit gateway The transit gateway uses its default route table for any VPC attachmentA security audit reveals that an Amazon EC2 instance that is deployed within a VPC can communicate with an EC2 instance that is deployed in any of the company's other VPCs A solutions architect needs to limit the traffic between the VPCs. Each VPC must be able to communicate only with a predefined, limited set of authorized VPCs.What should the solutions architect do to meet these requirements'?
C) Create a dedicated transit gateway route table for each VPC attachment. Route traffic only to the authorized VPCs.
A) Update the network ACL of each subnet within a VPC to allow outbound traffic only to the authorized VPCs Remove all deny rules except the default deny rule.
B) Update all the security groups that are used within a VPC to deny outbound traffic to security groups that are used within the unauthorized VPCs
D) Update the mam route table of each VPC to route traffic only to the authorized VPCs through the transit gateway

Amazon SAP-C02 Exam - Topic 2 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 2
[All SAP-C02 Questions]

A company uses AWS CloudFormation to deploy applications within multiple VPCs that are all attached to a transit gateway Each VPC that sends traffic to the public internet must send the traffic through a shared services VPC Each subnet within a VPC uses the default VPC route table and the traffic is routed to the transit gateway The transit gateway uses its default route table for any VPC attachment

A security audit reveals that an Amazon EC2 instance that is deployed within a VPC can communicate with an EC2 instance that is deployed in any of the company's other VPCs A solutions architect needs to limit the traffic between the VPCs. Each VPC must be able to communicate only with a predefined, limited set of authorized VPCs.

What should the solutions architect do to meet these requirements'?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

You can segment your network by creating multiple route tables in an AWS Transit Gateway and associate Amazon VPCs and VPNs to them. This will allow you to create isolated networks inside an AWS Transit Gateway similar to virtual routing and forwarding (VRFs) in traditional networks. The AWS Transit Gateway will have a default route table. The use of multiple route tables is optional.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Cecilia
3 months ago
D sounds risky. Changing the main route table could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
3 months ago
I feel like B could be a good choice. Security groups are flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
4 months ago
A is too broad. It might block other necessary traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
4 months ago
I agree, C seems the best. Dedicated route tables are clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
4 months ago
This question is tricky! I think option C makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
4 months ago
Definitely need to limit VPC communication, good call on this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
4 months ago
Option A could work, but it might be too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
5 months ago
Surprised that this wasn't caught earlier in the audit!
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
5 months ago
I disagree, I think updating the security groups (Option B) is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice for controlling traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
5 months ago
C is the clear winner. Who wants to deal with the headache of manually updating a bunch of network ACLs? Not me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
6 months ago
Haha, imagine trying to keep track of all those security group rules. Option C is definitely the sanity-saving choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
6 months ago
I agree, C is the way to go. Updating the route tables is a more comprehensive approach than trying to manage security groups or network ACLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards the dedicated transit gateway route table, but I wonder if that complicates things too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to limit traffic, and I think using network ACLs could be a viable option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
6 months ago
I think updating the security groups could work, but it feels like it might be too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
6 months ago
I remember discussing how transit gateways work, but I'm not sure if creating a dedicated route table is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
7 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of VPC networking and transit gateways. I'll make sure to read through the details carefully and consider the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. Updating the main route tables in each VPC to only allow traffic to authorized VPCs seems like a straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
7 months ago
Option C seems like the best solution. Isolating the VPCs through dedicated transit gateway route tables is a clean way to control the traffic flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
8 months ago
Option C seems like the most direct way to limit the VPC-to-VPC communication. I'll focus on understanding how to create and configure those dedicated transit gateway route tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
8 months ago
But what about A? Updating network ACLs could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the transit gateway setup. I'll need to review how that works before I can decide on the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky networking question. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Chantell
3 months ago
I’d lean towards option B for security groups. Denying unauthorized traffic is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
3 months ago
True, but ACLs can be tricky to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
3 months ago
But what about option A? Updating the network ACLs could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
7 months ago
Yeah, dedicated route tables could really help control traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
7 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel