MENU
A company wants to retire its Oracle Solaris NFS storage arrays. The company requires rapid data migration over its internet network connection to a combination of destinations for Amazon S3, Amazon EFS, and Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. The company also requires a full initial copy, as well as incremental transfers of changes until the retirement of the storage arrays. All data must be encrypted and checked for integrity.
What should a solutions architect recommend to meet these requirements?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium SAP-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
PA
Pansy
10 months ago
I’m not sure about the Application Migration Service for this use case.
CA
Carri
10 months ago
The S3 sync command seems too manual for this scale.
BE
Bette
10 months ago
I think AWS DataSync is the best option here.
BR
Brinda
11 months ago
Wait, can AWS Transfer for FTP really handle encryption?
RE
Regenia
11 months ago
Definitely agree, DataSync handles incremental transfers well!
CO
Cornell
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where AWS DataSync was the answer. It seems to fit the requirements for transferring to multiple destinations.
BO
Bobbye
11 months ago
The aws S3 sync command seems too manual for a full initial copy and incremental transfers. I feel like it might not handle encryption and integrity checks well.
MA
Marlon
11 months ago
I think the AWS Application Migration Service is more for server migrations, not just data transfers.
GE
Gene
12 months ago
I remember studying AWS DataSync for data migration, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit for this scenario.
AD
Adelina
12 months ago
This is a tricky one - there are a lot of moving parts with the different destination services and the need for encryption and integrity checks. I think I'd start by ruling out option D with AWS Transfer for FTP, as that seems a bit outdated compared to the other more modern solutions. Then I'd really dive into the pros and cons of A, B, and C to see which one best fits the requirements.
NI
Nicolette
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C with the aws s3 sync command. It's a simple, straightforward tool that I'm already familiar with, and it should be able to handle the encryption and integrity checks that are required. The only potential downside is managing the incremental updates, but I think I could script that pretty easily.
LA
Lashunda
1 year ago
Option B with AWS DataSync seems like a good fit to me. It's designed specifically for these kinds of data migration scenarios, and the ability to deploy an agent on-premises makes it easy to integrate with the existing infrastructure.
JE
Jennie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different AWS services that could potentially work, like DataSync, S3 sync, or even Transfer for FTP. I'd need to research each one a bit more to understand the pros and cons before deciding.
MO
Monte
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward data migration scenario. I'd probably go with option A and use AWS Application Migration Service - it seems like the most comprehensive solution that can handle the full initial copy and incremental updates, while also providing encryption and integrity checks.
CH
Charlie
1 year ago
I'd steer clear of Option D. Using AWS Transfer for FTP just seems like an outdated solution when you have modern options like DataSync available. Why complicate things with FTP when you can get a more seamless experience?
EL
Elena
1 year ago
I agree, Option D does seem outdated. DataSync would be a more modern and efficient choice.
LA
Lajuana
1 year ago
DataSync all the way! No need to reinvent the wheel when AWS has a service specifically designed for this kind of data migration. It's like using a Ferrari to move your furniture when you could just call the pros at the moving company.
KA
Katy
1 year ago
I agree with Cristal. DataSync is the best option for this scenario. It meets all the requirements effectively.
CR
Cristal
1 year ago
But DataSync is specifically designed for rapid data migration and encryption. It's a better fit for the requirements.
SH
Shenika
1 year ago
I was leaning towards Option A at first, but the requirement for rapid data migration makes me think DataSync is the better choice. AWS Application Migration Service might be overkill for this use case.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
Yeah, AWS Application Migration Service might be too much for what we need.
CH
Cherelle
1 year ago
I agree, DataSync seems like the best option for this scenario.
EM
Emile
1 year ago
I think DataSync is the way to go for rapid data migration.
WI
Wilburn
1 year ago
Option B looks like the way to go. DataSync seems to cover all the requirements - full initial copy, incremental transfers, encryption, and integrity checks. Seems like the most comprehensive solution.
CH
Christa
1 year ago
Definitely, DataSync provides a comprehensive solution for rapid data migration with encryption and integrity checks. It's the way to go.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
I agree, DataSync seems to be the best option for this scenario. It covers all the necessary requirements for the data migration.
IS
Isreal
1 year ago
B) Configure AWS DataSync. Configure the DataSync agent and deploy it to the local network. Create a transfer task and start the transfer.
MA
Marguerita
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the way to go. Using the AWS Application Migration Service seems more efficient.
CR
Cristal
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice. DataSync seems like the right tool for this job.