Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon SAP-C02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAP-C02 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All SAP-C02 Questions]

A company wants to retire its Oracle Solaris NFS storage arrays. The company requires rapid data migration over its internet network connection to a combination of destinations for Amazon S3, Amazon EFS, and Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. The company also requires a full initial copy, as well as incremental transfers of changes until the retirement of the storage arrays. All data must be encrypted and checked for integrity.

What should a solutions architect recommend to meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Pansy
3 months ago
I’m not sure about the Application Migration Service for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
3 months ago
The S3 sync command seems too manual for this scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
3 months ago
I think AWS DataSync is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
3 months ago
Wait, can AWS Transfer for FTP really handle encryption?
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
4 months ago
Definitely agree, DataSync handles incremental transfers well!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where AWS DataSync was the answer. It seems to fit the requirements for transferring to multiple destinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
4 months ago
The aws S3 sync command seems too manual for a full initial copy and incremental transfers. I feel like it might not handle encryption and integrity checks well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
4 months ago
I think the AWS Application Migration Service is more for server migrations, not just data transfers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
4 months ago
I remember studying AWS DataSync for data migration, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
5 months ago
This is a tricky one - there are a lot of moving parts with the different destination services and the need for encryption and integrity checks. I think I'd start by ruling out option D with AWS Transfer for FTP, as that seems a bit outdated compared to the other more modern solutions. Then I'd really dive into the pros and cons of A, B, and C to see which one best fits the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C with the aws s3 sync command. It's a simple, straightforward tool that I'm already familiar with, and it should be able to handle the encryption and integrity checks that are required. The only potential downside is managing the incremental updates, but I think I could script that pretty easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
5 months ago
Option B with AWS DataSync seems like a good fit to me. It's designed specifically for these kinds of data migration scenarios, and the ability to deploy an agent on-premises makes it easy to integrate with the existing infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different AWS services that could potentially work, like DataSync, S3 sync, or even Transfer for FTP. I'd need to research each one a bit more to understand the pros and cons before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward data migration scenario. I'd probably go with option A and use AWS Application Migration Service - it seems like the most comprehensive solution that can handle the full initial copy and incremental updates, while also providing encryption and integrity checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
7 months ago
I'd steer clear of Option D. Using AWS Transfer for FTP just seems like an outdated solution when you have modern options like DataSync available. Why complicate things with FTP when you can get a more seamless experience?
upvoted 0 times
Elena
6 months ago
I agree, Option D does seem outdated. DataSync would be a more modern and efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lajuana
7 months ago
DataSync all the way! No need to reinvent the wheel when AWS has a service specifically designed for this kind of data migration. It's like using a Ferrari to move your furniture when you could just call the pros at the moving company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
7 months ago
I agree with Cristal. DataSync is the best option for this scenario. It meets all the requirements effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
7 months ago
But DataSync is specifically designed for rapid data migration and encryption. It's a better fit for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
8 months ago
I was leaning towards Option A at first, but the requirement for rapid data migration makes me think DataSync is the better choice. AWS Application Migration Service might be overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
6 months ago
Yeah, AWS Application Migration Service might be too much for what we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
6 months ago
I agree, DataSync seems like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
7 months ago
I think DataSync is the way to go for rapid data migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilburn
8 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. DataSync seems to cover all the requirements - full initial copy, incremental transfers, encryption, and integrity checks. Seems like the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
Christa
7 months ago
Definitely, DataSync provides a comprehensive solution for rapid data migration with encryption and integrity checks. It's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
8 months ago
I agree, DataSync seems to be the best option for this scenario. It covers all the necessary requirements for the data migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
8 months ago
B) Configure AWS DataSync. Configure the DataSync agent and deploy it to the local network. Create a transfer task and start the transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marguerita
8 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the way to go. Using the AWS Application Migration Service seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
9 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. DataSync seems like the right tool for this job.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel