New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon SAA-C03 Exam - Topic 2 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's SAA-C03 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 2
[All SAA-C03 Questions]

A company uses NFS to store large video files in on-premises network attached storage. Each video file ranges in size from 1MB to 500 GB. The total storage is 70 TB and is no longer growing. The company decides to migrate the video files to Amazon S3. The company must migrate the video files as soon as possible while using the least possible network bandwidth.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

AWS Outposts is a fully managed service that delivers AWS infrastructure and services to virtually any on-premises or edge location for a consistent hybrid experience. AWS Outposts supports Amazon EKS, which is a managed service that makes it easy to run Kubernetes on AWS and on-premises. By installing an AWS Outposts rack in the company's data center, the company can run containers in a Kubernetes environment using Amazon EKS and other AWS managed services, while keeping the data locally in the company's data center and meeting the compliance requirements. AWS Outposts also provides a seamless connection to the local AWS Region for access to a broad range of AWS services.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Local Zones are not deployed in the company's data center, but in large metropolitan areas closer to end users. AWS Local Zones are owned, managed, and operated by AWS, and they provide low-latency access to the public internet and the local AWS Region. Option B is not a valid solution because AWS Snowmobile is a service that transports exabytes of data to AWS using a 45-foot long ruggedized shipping container pulled by a semi-trailer truck. AWS Snowmobile is not designed for running containers or AWS managed services on-premises, but for large-scale data migration. Option D is not a valid solution because AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized is a device that provides 80 TB of HDD or 210 TB of NVMe storage capacity for data transfer and edge computing. AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized does not support Amazon EKS or other AWS managed services, and it is not suitable for running containers in a Kubernetes environment.


AWS Outposts - Amazon Web Services

Amazon EKS on AWS Outposts - Amazon EKS

AWS Local Zones - Amazon Web Services

AWS Snowmobile - Amazon Web Services

[AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized - Amazon Web Services]

by Hortencia at Jul 09, 2024, 09:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAA-C03 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Celestina
3 months ago
D seems overly complicated for just migrating files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
3 months ago
Wait, Snowball Edge can handle 500 GB files? That's impressive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
3 months ago
C sounds interesting, but is it really the fastest way?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
4 months ago
I think A could work, but it might take forever with that much data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
4 months ago
B is definitely the best option for large data transfers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that AWS Direct Connect can help with large data transfers, but it seems like overkill for this scenario. I lean towards option B, but I need to double-check the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question about migrating data to S3, and I think the S3 File Gateway options could work too. But I’m unsure if they would be as fast as using Snowball.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think using the AWS CLI to copy files directly to S3 might not be efficient for such large files. It could take a long time and consume a lot of bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of minimizing bandwidth during migrations. I think option B with Snowball Edge could be the best choice since it physically transfers data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think option D is the best solution. Setting up a Direct Connect connection and using an S3 File Gateway would give us the best of both worlds - the speed and efficiency of a direct connection, plus the flexibility of the S3 File Gateway to handle the large file sizes. It might take a bit more setup, but I think it would be the most reliable and scalable approach in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Based on the requirements, option B with the AWS Snowball Edge seems like the way to go. It would allow us to transfer the data offline, which should be much faster and use less network bandwidth than trying to do it all over the internet. I'd probably go with that and try to get the Snowball Edge device set up as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the options here. It seems like we have a few different approaches we could take, but I'm not sure which one would be the most efficient. I might need to do some more research on the different AWS services mentioned to figure out which one would work best for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward migration question. I'd probably start by looking at the requirements - we need to migrate the video files as quickly as possible while using the least network bandwidth. That rules out option A, since copying all the files locally and then to S3 would use a lot of bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking which ECC Queue record contains the XML payload from the MID Server, so I need to focus on the "Input" options. Then I'll need to determine which of those is the correct status for the payload to be processed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where "quota" was definitely the correct term for maximum amounts. So I'm leaning toward that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
10 months ago
Wait, so I can't just use my neighbor's WiFi to transfer all this data? Dang, there goes my brilliant plan!
upvoted 0 times
Dorian
8 months ago
User 3: Yeah, using AWS Snowball will help you avoid using up all your neighbor's WiFi bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
8 months ago
User 2: AWS Snowball would be a great solution for transferring large amounts of data quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
9 months ago
User 1: You can use AWS Snowball to transfer the data to Amazon S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lourdes
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards the S3 File Gateway with Direct Connect option. That way, we can take advantage of the faster network connection and minimize the impact on the existing NFS infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
Essie
8 months ago
Let's go with that solution then, it seems like the best option for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
8 months ago
Agreed, it will help us migrate the video files quickly with minimal impact on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
9 months ago
S3 File Gateway with Direct Connect sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Almeta
10 months ago
Haha, can you imagine trying to transfer 70 TB of data using the AWS CLI? That would take forever! I think we need a more scalable solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
11 months ago
Hmm, the Snowball Edge option sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if it's the most efficient for a migration this size. I wonder if the S3 File Gateway might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
10 months ago
The S3 File Gateway might be a better choice for efficiency in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
10 months ago
I think the Snowball Edge option could work well for this migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luke
11 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one! I'm not sure if I can choose the best solution here. I'll need to really analyze the requirements and the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Lauran
10 months ago
User 4: DataSync can help optimize the transfer process and minimize the impact on network bandwidth. It's worth looking into.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
10 months ago
User 3: Another option could be using AWS DataSync to transfer the files incrementally to Amazon S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
10 months ago
User 2: That's a good idea! Snowball can help transfer large amounts of data quickly without using much network bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
10 months ago
User 1: Have you considered using AWS Snowball to transfer the large video files to Amazon S3?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
11 months ago
I'm not sure about option B. I think option D might be better because setting up an AWS Direct Connect connection can provide a dedicated network connection for transferring the files to Amazon S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
11 months ago
I agree with Kimberlie. Option B seems like the most efficient way to migrate the video files quickly. It's important to minimize the impact on our network during the transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
11 months ago
I think option B is the best solution. Using AWS Snowball Edge will help us transfer the large video files to Amazon S3 without consuming too much network bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel