Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam PAS-C01 Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 8
[All PAS-C01 Questions]

A company is designing a disaster recovery (DR) strategy for an SAP HANA database that runs on an Amazon EC2 instance in a single Availability Zone The company can tolerate a long RTO and an RPO greater than zero if it means that the company can save money on its DR process.

The company has configured an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to automatically recover the EC2 instance if the instance experiences an unexpected issue. The company has set up AWS Backint Agent for SAP HANA to save the backups into Amazon S3.

What is the MOST cost-effective DR option for the company's SAP HANA database?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

This option would allow the company to continue using Oracle Database while also meeting their compliance requirements, as they would not need to install any additional software on their on-premises servers. They can use Oracle Data Guard to replicate their existing Oracle Database to an instance running on AWS, providing a way to migrate their SAP landscape to AWS while still using the same database.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Benedict
21 days ago
I'm just here for the free coffee and donuts. Wait, this isn't that kind of exam? My bad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
25 days ago
Hmm, Option D seems a bit risky to me. Restoring from EBS backups might take longer than from S3, and the cost savings might not be that significant.
upvoted 0 times
Leonida
4 days ago
I agree, restoring from EBS backups can be slower than from S3. Option D might not be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tanesha
28 days ago
Option A looks good, but I'm not sure if the standard SAP HANA restore process is the most efficient. The CloudFormation automation is a nice touch, though.
upvoted 0 times
Carli
2 days ago
C: Maybe we can explore option D as well, it involves launching a new EC2 instance from backups stored in Amazon EBS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
16 days ago
B: I agree, but maybe we should consider other options for a more efficient restore process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
20 days ago
A: Option A sounds like a good choice, the automation with CloudFormation is a plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynna
1 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go. The secondary instance has the same EC2 type, and with the preload option turned on, the recovery time should be faster.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
2 days ago
It's definitely a cost-effective option for the company's SAP HANA database DR strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
8 days ago
I agree. With the preload option turned on, the recovery process should be quicker and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
28 days ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. Having the same EC2 instance type for the secondary instance is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annette
1 months ago
Option B seems like the most cost-effective solution, as it uses a less powerful EC2 instance type. However, with the preload option turned off, the recovery time might be longer.
upvoted 0 times
Stefany
17 days ago
B) Option B seems like the most cost-effective solution, as it uses a less powerful EC2 instance type. However, with the preload option turned off, the recovery time might be longer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
28 days ago
C) Launch a secondary EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database on an equivalent EC2 instance type in a second Availability Zone Configure SAP HANA system replication with the preload option turned on
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 months ago
B) Launch a secondary EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database on a less powerful EC2 instance type in a second Availability Zone Configure SAP HANA system replication with the preload option turned off
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it uses Amazon EBS for backups which can be more reliable than S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
I think option A is the most cost-effective DR option because it automatically launches a new EC2 instance from backups in a second Availability Zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it uses Amazon EBS for backups which can be more reliable for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
I think option A is the most cost-effective DR option because it automatically launches a new EC2 instance from backups in a second Availability Zone.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel