Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

A company is designing a disaster recovery (DR) strategy for an SAP HANA database that runs on an Amazon EC2 instance in a single Availability Zone The company can tolerate a long RTO and an RPO greater than zero if it means that the company can save money on its DR process.The company has configured an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to automatically recover the EC2 instance if the instance experiences an unexpected issue. The company has set up AWS Backint Agent for SAP HANA to save the backups into Amazon S3.What is the MOST cost-effective DR option for the company's SAP HANA database?
D) Set up AWS CloudFormation to automatically launch a new EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database in a second Availability Zone from backups that are stored in Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) When the SAP HANA database is operational perform a database restore by using the standard SAP HANA restore process
A) Set up AWS CloudFormation to automatically launch a new EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database in a second Availability Zone from backups that are stored in Amazon S3 When the SAP HANA database is operational perform a database restore by using the standard SAP HANA restore process.
B) Launch a secondary EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database on a less powerful EC2 instance type in a second Availability Zone Configure SAP HANA system replication with the preload option turned off
C) Launch a secondary EC2 instance tor the SAP HANA database on an equivalent EC2 instance type in a second Availability Zone Configure SAP HANA system replication with the preload option turned on

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 8
[All PAS-C01 Questions]

A company is designing a disaster recovery (DR) strategy for an SAP HANA database that runs on an Amazon EC2 instance in a single Availability Zone The company can tolerate a long RTO and an RPO greater than zero if it means that the company can save money on its DR process.

The company has configured an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to automatically recover the EC2 instance if the instance experiences an unexpected issue. The company has set up AWS Backint Agent for SAP HANA to save the backups into Amazon S3.

What is the MOST cost-effective DR option for the company's SAP HANA database?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

This option would allow the company to continue using Oracle Database while also meeting their compliance requirements, as they would not need to install any additional software on their on-premises servers. They can use Oracle Data Guard to replicate their existing Oracle Database to an instance running on AWS, providing a way to migrate their SAP landscape to AWS while still using the same database.


by Aliza at Dec 11, 2023, 09:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Art
9 months ago
D sounds too expensive with EBS involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
10 months ago
Wait, can we really rely on just backups in S3?
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
10 months ago
Not sure about B, that could lead to performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
10 months ago
I agree, A is the most economical route!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
10 months ago
Option A seems like a solid choice for cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because it mentions using S3, but I’m a bit confused about the restore process and whether it’s really the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between instance types and replication options. I feel like option C could be more reliable, but it might cost more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
11 months ago
I think option B might be cheaper since it suggests using a less powerful EC2 instance, but I’m not entirely clear on how that affects RTO and RPO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
11 months ago
I remember that using AWS CloudFormation can automate the recovery process, but I'm not sure if using S3 for backups is the most cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
11 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with SAP HANA and the different DR options, so I'll need to read through the question and options a few times to make sure I understand the nuances. I don't want to rush into an answer and get it wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is that the company wants to save money on the DR process, so we need to find the most cost-effective solution. Option B seems to fit that criteria by using a less powerful EC2 instance for the secondary site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the differences between the options. Option A talks about using backups in S3, while option D mentions using EBS. I'm not sure which one would be more cost-effective. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward - we're looking for the most cost-effective DR option for the SAP HANA database. I think I'll go with option B since it mentions using a less powerful EC2 instance type, which should save on costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option B is the right answer here. The question specifically mentions the "Knowledge component list", so that seems like the logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
11 months ago
Easy peasy! The hypervisor abstracts the CPU and memory resources from the physical hardware and presents them to the virtual machines. This allows the VMs to have their own dedicated compute and storage resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking for two critical steps, but there are four options. I'll need to carefully read through each one to determine the best two answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is testing whether bid-rigging is a systematic manipulation, not just a one-time thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
11 months ago
I feel like there's a balance between testing and speed, but I'm not entirely sure which answer best captures that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
1 year ago
I'm just here for the free coffee and donuts. Wait, this isn't that kind of exam? My bad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
1 year ago
Hmm, Option D seems a bit risky to me. Restoring from EBS backups might take longer than from S3, and the cost savings might not be that significant.
upvoted 0 times
Peggie
1 year ago
Yeah, Option A sounds like a safer and more cost-effective choice for the company's SAP HANA database DR strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
1 year ago
I think Option A could be a good compromise. Launching a new EC2 instance from S3 backups in a second Availability Zone seems like a reliable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
I agree, restoring from EBS backups can be slower than from S3. Option D might not be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tanesha
1 year ago
Option A looks good, but I'm not sure if the standard SAP HANA restore process is the most efficient. The CloudFormation automation is a nice touch, though.
upvoted 0 times
Carli
1 year ago
C: Maybe we can explore option D as well, it involves launching a new EC2 instance from backups stored in Amazon EBS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
1 year ago
B: I agree, but maybe we should consider other options for a more efficient restore process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
1 year ago
A: Option A sounds like a good choice, the automation with CloudFormation is a plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynna
1 year ago
I think Option C is the way to go. The secondary instance has the same EC2 type, and with the preload option turned on, the recovery time should be faster.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
1 year ago
It's definitely a cost-effective option for the company's SAP HANA database DR strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
1 year ago
I agree. With the preload option turned on, the recovery process should be quicker and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
1 year ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. Having the same EC2 instance type for the secondary instance is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annette
1 year ago
Option B seems like the most cost-effective solution, as it uses a less powerful EC2 instance type. However, with the preload option turned off, the recovery time might be longer.
upvoted 0 times
Son
1 year ago
C) That's a good point. Option C might provide better performance with the preload option turned on, but it could be more expensive. It's a trade-off between cost and recovery time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
1 year ago
B) Option B seems like the most cost-effective solution, as it uses a less powerful EC2 instance type. However, with the preload option turned off, the recovery time might be longer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 year ago
C) Launch a secondary EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database on an equivalent EC2 instance type in a second Availability Zone Configure SAP HANA system replication with the preload option turned on
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 year ago
B) Launch a secondary EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database on a less powerful EC2 instance type in a second Availability Zone Configure SAP HANA system replication with the preload option turned off
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it uses Amazon EBS for backups which can be more reliable than S3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
I think option A is the most cost-effective DR option because it automatically launches a new EC2 instance from backups in a second Availability Zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it uses Amazon EBS for backups which can be more reliable for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
I think option A is the most cost-effective DR option because it automatically launches a new EC2 instance from backups in a second Availability Zone.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel