Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 5 Question 22 Discussion

A company uses an SAP application that runs batch jobs that ate performance sensitive. The batch jobs can be restarted safely The SAP application has sot application servers. The SAP application functions reliability as long as the SAP application availability remains greater than 60%. The company wants to migrate the SAP application to AWS. The company is using a duster with two Availability ZonesHow should the company distribute the SAP application servers to maintain system reliability?
C) Distribute the SAP application servers equally across two Availability Zones
A) Distribute the SAP application servers equally across three partition placement groups
B) Distribute the SAP application servers equally across three Availability Zones
D) Create an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling group across two Availability Zones Set a minimum capacity value of 4.

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 5 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 5
[All PAS-C01 Questions]

A company uses an SAP application that runs batch jobs that ate performance sensitive. The batch jobs can be restarted safely The SAP application has sot application servers. The SAP application functions reliability as long as the SAP application availability remains greater than 60%. The company wants to migrate the SAP application to AWS. The company is using a duster with two Availability Zones

How should the company distribute the SAP application servers to maintain system reliability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

C is correct because distributing the SAP application servers equally across two Availability Zones provides system reliability by ensuring that at least three application servers are available in each Availability Zone. This meets the requirement that the SAP application availability remains greater than 60%. This will also provide an additional layer of redundancy and protection against a single point of failure. Reference: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/sap-on-aws-technical-deployment-guide/high-availability.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/sap-on-aws-technical-deployment-guide/amazon-ec2.html


by Kate at Oct 18, 2023, 09:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Noah
9 months ago
Totally agree with C, keeping it simple is smart!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
10 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention load balancing in the question!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
10 months ago
Wait, why three partition placement groups? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
10 months ago
I think D is better, Auto Scaling is key for reliability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
Gotta go with option C, two Availability Zones make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
10 months ago
I recall that keeping servers in the same zone can lead to issues if that zone goes down. I think option C is the safest bet, but I’m not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to balance load across zones. I feel like option D with Auto Scaling could provide better reliability, but I'm not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
11 months ago
I think option C makes sense since it mentions two Availability Zones, but I wonder if we should really be using three instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
11 months ago
I remember that distributing servers across Availability Zones is crucial for reliability, but I'm not sure if two zones are enough for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards the Auto Scaling group option. That way we can automatically scale up and down as needed to maintain the required availability. Plus, setting a minimum capacity of 4 seems like a good way to ensure we have enough capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy. Since the SAP application needs to be available more than 60% of the time, I'm thinking distributing the servers across two Availability Zones is the way to go. That should give us the redundancy we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the partition placement groups. Do those come into play here, or is that a red herring? I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
11 months ago
This looks like a classic high availability question. I think the key is to distribute the SAP application servers across multiple Availability Zones to ensure reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
11 months ago
This HIPAA question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the administrative requirements correctly. I'll need to review the key points about workforce training, disciplinary actions, and documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the network requirements for SAN boot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. I'll have to carefully read through the options to try to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
11 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I remember from class that behavioral contracts need to have a description of the target behavior, how it will be measured, and the consequences. I think the answer is A, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
11 months ago
9% capitalization rate, different growth stages... I'm going to break this down step by step and probably use my financial calculator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
11 months ago
Based on the information provided, it seems like the processing Frank wants to do is fairly limited and doesn't involve sensitive personal data. As long as it doesn't negatively impact the data subjects' rights, a risk analysis may not be necessary. I'll double-check the GDPR guidelines to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
2 years ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option D with the Auto Scaling group could work too. That way, you'd have a bit more redundancy and flexibility if one of the Availability Zones fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
2 years ago
Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. Plus, it's the most efficient option since we don't need to use a third Availability Zone or set up a complex Auto Scaling group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
2 years ago
I agree. Option C seems like the best choice here. Distributing the SAP application servers equally across two Availability Zones should ensure that the system remains reliable, even if one Availability Zone goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
2 years ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. The company needs to maintain at least 60% availability for the SAP application, and they're using a cluster with two Availability Zones.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel