Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

A company is moving to the AWS Cloud gradually. The company has multiple SAP landscapes on VMware The company already has sandbox development and QA systems on AWS The company's production system is still running on premises. The company has 2 months to cut over the entre landscape to the AWS CloudThe company has adopted a hybrid architecture for the next 2 months and needs to synchronize its shared file systems between the landscapes These shared file systems include trans directory mounts, /software directory mounts, and third-party integration mounts in the on-premises landscape the company has NFS mounts between the servers On the AWS infrastructure side the company is using Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) to share the common filesAn SAP solutions architect needs to design a solution to schedule transfer of these shared files bidirectional four times each day. The data transfer must be encryptedWhich solution will meet these requirements?
B) Install an AWS DataSync agent on the on-premises VMware platform Use the DataSync endpoint to synchronize between the on-premises NFS server and Amazon EFS on AWS
A) Write an rsync script Schedule the script through cron for four times each day in the on-premises VMware servers to transfer the data from on premises to AWS
C) Order an AWS Snowcone device Use the Snowcone device to transfer data between the on-premises servers and AWS
D) Set up a separate AWS Direct Connect connection for synchronization between the on-premises servers and AWS

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 2
[All PAS-C01 Questions]

A company is moving to the AWS Cloud gradually. The company has multiple SAP landscapes on VMware The company already has sandbox development and QA systems on AWS The company's production system is still running on premises. The company has 2 months to cut over the entre landscape to the AWS Cloud

The company has adopted a hybrid architecture for the next 2 months and needs to synchronize its shared file systems between the landscapes These shared file systems include trans directory mounts, /software directory mounts, and third-party integration mounts in the on-premises landscape the company has NFS mounts between the servers On the AWS infrastructure side the company is using Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) to share the common files

An SAP solutions architect needs to design a solution to schedule transfer of these shared files bidirectional four times each day. The data transfer must be encrypted

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

AWS DataSync can be used to schedule and automate the transfer of data between on-premises NFS servers and Amazon EFS on AWS. It also allows data to be encrypted during transfer, which meets the requirement for encryption.


by Graciela at Sep 14, 2024, 10:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mila
6 months ago
Not sure if rsync is secure enough for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
6 months ago
D is overkill for just file synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
7 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention using DataSync sooner!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
7 months ago
I disagree, A could work too with the right setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
7 months ago
B seems like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
7 months ago
I recall that Direct Connect is great for stable connections, but I wonder if it’s necessary just for file synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the Snowcone option. I thought it was more for large data transfers rather than ongoing synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
8 months ago
I think AWS DataSync could be the right choice here. It was mentioned in a practice question about syncing data securely between on-premises and AWS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
8 months ago
I remember we discussed using rsync for file transfers, but I'm not sure if it's the best option for bi-directional sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
8 months ago
Option A with the rsync script could work, but scheduling and automating that across multiple servers seems risky. I'd prefer a more managed service like DataSync to handle the heavy lifting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different file system types and how they'll work together. I'll need to research the Amazon EFS and on-premises NFS integration a bit more to feel confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward data synchronization problem, and I think option B with AWS DataSync is the way to go. It's designed for this exact use case and will handle the encryption and scheduling requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D with the AWS Direct Connect connection. That would provide a dedicated, high-speed link between the on-premises and cloud environments, which could be useful for this large data transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
8 months ago
I'll probably go with option B. Grouping by features seems like it would align best with the Scrum methodology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 years ago
Haha, yeah, the Snowcone option is a bit of a stretch. Although it would be kind of fun to have a little snow in the data center.
upvoted 0 times
Kirby
2 years ago
B: Haha, true. Snow in the data center does sound interesting, but not very practical in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
2 years ago
A: Definitely. Plus, it's a more practical solution compared to ordering a Snowcone device just for data transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
2 years ago
B: Yeah, I agree. Using the AWS DataSync agent would make the process much smoother and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
2 years ago
A: I think option B is the best choice. It seems like the most efficient way to synchronize the shared files bidirectionally.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
2 years ago
Ha! Snowcone? Really? I don't think they're going to want to deal with physically shipping a device for this. AWS DataSync is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lisha
2 years ago
B) Install an AWS DataSync agent on the on-premises VMware platform Use the DataSync endpoint to synchronize between the on-premises NFS server and Amazon EFS on AWS
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
2 years ago
A) Write an rsync script Schedule the script through cron for four times each day in the on-premises VMware servers to transfer the data from on premises to AWS
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
2 years ago
B) Install an AWS DataSync agent on the on-premises VMware platform Use the DataSync endpoint to synchronize between the on-premises NFS server and Amazon EFS on AWS
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yun
2 years ago
I was thinking about the rsync script, but the DataSync agent is probably a better option. It's more reliable and easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
Lavonda
2 years ago
The DataSync agent on the on-premises VMware platform will definitely simplify the process of transferring the shared files to Amazon EFS on AWS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
2 years ago
I think using AWS DataSync will make the synchronization process smoother and more efficient compared to manually running an rsync script multiple times a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
2 years ago
I agree, the DataSync agent seems like a more reliable option for transferring the shared files bidirectional four times each day.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmett
2 years ago
I'm not sure about option B. I think option A could also work if properly configured and monitored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
2 years ago
I agree with Joanna. Option B seems like the most practical choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
2 years ago
Agreed, the DataSync agent is a great choice here. It's designed for this kind of hybrid environment setup and will handle the encryption requirements too.
upvoted 0 times
Pete
2 years ago
Agreed, the DataSync agent is a great choice here. It's designed for this kind of hybrid environment setup and will handle the encryption requirements too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
2 years ago
That sounds like a solid plan. DataSync should make the file transfer process smooth and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
2 years ago
B) Install an AWS DataSync agent on the on-premises VMware platform Use the DataSync endpoint to synchronize between the on-premises NFS server and Amazon EFS on AWS
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
2 years ago
I think option B is the best solution. Using AWS DataSync agent will ensure secure and efficient synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 years ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward solution. Using the AWS DataSync agent to transfer the files between the on-premises NFS server and AWS EFS is efficient and secure.
upvoted 0 times
Tomoko
2 years ago
I think setting up a separate Direct Connect connection would be overkill for this situation. DataSync is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 years ago
I agree, DataSync is designed for exactly this kind of scenario. It will make the synchronization process smooth and reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
2 years ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward solution. Using the AWS DataSync agent to transfer the files between the on-premises NFS server and AWS EFS is efficient and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel