New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 10 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 10
[All PAS-C01 Questions]

A company is planning to migrate its on-premises SAP ERP Central Component (SAP ECC) system on SAP HANA to AWS Each month the system experiences two peaks in usage. The first peak is on the 21st day of the month when the company runs payroll. The second peak is on the last day of the month when the company processes and exports credit data Both peak workloads are of high importance and cannot be rescheduled

The current SAP ECC system has six application servers an of a similar size. During normal operation outside of peak usage four application servers would suffice

Which purchasing option will meet the company's requirements MOST cost-effectively on AWS?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

VPC endpoints to ensure that traffic to and from the CloudWatch and EC2 services stays within the VPC. Additionally, an IAM policy is created to grant access to only the necessary actions, such as DescribeInstances and GetMetricStatistics, for all EC2 resources. This approach will provide secure monitoring of the SAP system while maximizing security and ensuring support from both SAP and AWS.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Haydee
4 months ago
Six Reserved Instances sounds like overkill for normal operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
4 months ago
Surprised they can manage with just four Reserved Instances during peaks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
4 months ago
Not sure if Spot Instances are reliable enough for payroll.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
4 months ago
I think four Reserved Instances and two Spot Instances is the best mix!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
4 months ago
Six On-Demand Instances would be too pricey for regular use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I feel like six On-Demand Instances would be too expensive, but I can't shake the feeling that we might need all six servers during peak times. This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherron
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m a bit uncertain. I remember that having some On-Demand instances can help during peak times, but I’m not sure if four Reserved is enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
5 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to balance between Reserved and On-Demand Instances. I feel like the peaks might make On-Demand a better choice, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how Reserved Instances are usually more cost-effective for steady workloads, but I'm not sure if they fit perfectly here with the peaks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The two ways to assign the migrated female customers to the segment are B and C - running the index reindex command and clicking the Refresh Segment Data button.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
5 months ago
Okay, the new CDB_-views are a good clue. I think I've got a handle on the main differences now, so I'll start selecting the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
9 months ago
I don't know, guys. You're all overthinking this. Why not just use a bunch of hamsters on wheels to power the system? I heard they're really energy-efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
10 months ago
Option C seems a bit too conservative to me. Why pay for Reserved Instances when you only need four servers most of the time? I think a mix of Reserved and on-demand is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
10 months ago
Hold on, is this a trick question? What if we go with Option B and just run everything on-demand? I mean, it's not like we're talking about a massive scale here, right? Who cares about cost-optimization, let's just keep it simple!
upvoted 0 times
Fallon
8 months ago
Let's not overlook cost-optimization, we need to find the most cost-effective solution for our peak workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
8 months ago
I think we should consider the peak workloads and go for a mix of Reserved and On-Demand Instances to save costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
9 months ago
Option B might work for simplicity, but it might end up costing us more in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leeann
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. Spot Instances can provide significant cost savings for the peak workloads, and the Reserved Instances will cover the base usage.
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
9 months ago
It seems like a good balance between cost-effectiveness and meeting the peak workload demands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
9 months ago
I agree, having Reserved Instances for the base usage is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
9 months ago
Option A sounds like a good choice. Spot Instances can really help with cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecily
10 months ago
Option D seems like the most cost-effective choice. The company can reserve instances for the baseline usage and use on-demand instances to handle the peak workloads, which makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Sherell
9 months ago
It's important to balance cost-effectiveness with performance, and option D seems to achieve that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
9 months ago
Using reserved instances for baseline usage and on-demand instances for peak workloads is a smart strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
10 months ago
I agree, option D seems like a good choice. It provides the flexibility needed for the peak workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celeste
11 months ago
But wouldn't it be more cost-effective to have a mix of Reserved and Spot Instances for the peak workloads?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) Four Reserved Instances and two Spot Instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) Six Reserved Instances.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel