New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon PAS-C01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's PAS-C01 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 1
[All PAS-C01 Questions]

A company wants to improve the RPO and RTO for its SAP disaster recovery (DR) solution by running the DR solution on AWS The company is running SAP ERP Central Component (SAP ECO on SAP HANA The company has set an RPO of 15 minutes and an RTO of 4 hours.

The production SAP HANA database is running on a physical appliance that has x86 architecture. The appliance has 1 TB of memory and the SAP HANA global allocation limit is set to 768 GB. The SAP application servers are running as VMs on VMware and they store data on an NFS file system The company does not want to change any existing SAP HANA parameters that are related to data and log backup for its on-premises systems.

What should an SAP solutions architect do to meet the DR objectives MOST cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

VPC endpoints to ensure that traffic to and from the CloudWatch and EC2 services stays within the VPC. Additionally, an IAM policy is created to grant access to only the necessary actions, such as DescribeInstances and GetMetricStatistics, for all EC2 resources. This approach will provide secure monitoring of the SAP system while maximizing security and ensuring support from both SAP and AWS.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sap/latest/general/data-provider-req.html#vpc-endpoints


by Dalene at Dec 25, 2023, 04:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAS-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sabra
3 months ago
D is interesting, but not sure about using ASYNC replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
3 months ago
Wait, can we really achieve that RPO with just 5 minutes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
3 months ago
C sounds too risky for continuous replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
4 months ago
I think B is better with the AWS Storage Gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
4 months ago
Option A seems solid, especially with the 5-minute log backup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
4 months ago
I vaguely remember something about using smaller EC2 instances for cost-effectiveness. But I’m not clear on how that impacts the overall DR strategy for SAP HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
4 months ago
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery sounds familiar, but I’m uncertain if it meets the RTO requirement effectively. I need to double-check its capabilities for continuous replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to choose between AWS DataSync and Storage Gateway. I feel like DataSync might be the better option here, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of log backup frequency for RPO. Changing it to 5 minutes seems like a good idea, but I'm not sure if that's enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the CloudEndure option in C. While it might provide the most seamless disaster recovery, the cost implications could be higher. I'd want to do some more research on the pricing and tradeoffs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
5 months ago
Based on the details provided, option B looks like the most cost-effective approach. Leveraging AWS Storage Gateway and DataSync seems like a good way to meet the RPO and RTO requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
5 months ago
I think the key is finding the right balance between cost and performance. We'll need to carefully consider the options for the SAP HANA database, application servers, and file storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
Okay, let's break this down step-by-step. We need to meet the RPO and RTO objectives while keeping costs low, so we'll need to leverage AWS services effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before I start planning my approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward organizational structure question. I'll think through the key details - small firm, 100 employees, two-story building, no plans to expand, and non-custom furniture. Based on that, I'm leaning towards functional departmentalization as the most likely structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
5 months ago
This looks like a classic anomaly detection problem. The Anomaly Detector service seems like the obvious choice here to identify unusual values in the time series data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
Okay, let's see... I think the key here is identifying the type of survey that measures end-to-end network performance. Active ping seems like the most likely option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
9 months ago
I bet the SAP solutions architect is already dreaming of a 'Hana-ful' of AWS services to choose from!
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
9 months ago
Option D is intriguing, but I'm concerned about using a smaller EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database. Wouldn't that impact performance and reliability?
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
8 months ago
Perhaps we should look into the other options provided and weigh the pros and cons before deciding on the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
8 months ago
I agree, performance and reliability are crucial for the SAP HANA database. We should explore all options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
8 months ago
You're right, using a smaller EC2 instance may affect performance. Maybe we should consider other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
8 months ago
Option D is intriguing, but I'm concerned about using a smaller EC2 instance for the SAP HANA database. Wouldn't that impact performance and reliability?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathrine
10 months ago
Option C with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery looks appealing, but it might be overkill for this scenario and could be more expensive than the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
8 months ago
I think option A could be a good compromise, it seems to address the requirements effectively without unnecessary costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
8 months ago
I agree, we should consider the cost-effectiveness of the solution while meeting the DR objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
8 months ago
Option C with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery looks appealing, but it might be overkill for this scenario and could be more expensive than the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tawna
10 months ago
I'm not sure about Option B. Using AWS Storage Gateway File Gateway for the SAP HANA database backups might add an unnecessary layer of complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
8 months ago
Perhaps Option A would be a better choice for a more straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
8 months ago
I agree, simplicity is key when it comes to disaster recovery solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
9 months ago
Option B does seem a bit complex. Maybe there's a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francoise
10 months ago
Option A seems the most cost-effective, as it leverages native AWS services like CLI, DataSync, and EFS to meet the RPO and RTO requirements without changing the existing SAP HANA parameters.
upvoted 0 times
Jarvis
9 months ago
It's important to find a solution that meets the company's objectives while also being cost-effective. Option A seems to strike that balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
9 months ago
I agree, using AWS services like DataSync and EFS can help streamline the DR process for SAP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
9 months ago
Option A seems the most cost-effective, as it leverages native AWS services like CLI, DataSync, and EFS to meet the RPO and RTO requirements without changing the existing SAP HANA parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adell
10 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option A is the most cost-effective solution for meeting the DR objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more effective as it utilizes CloudEndure Disaster Recovery for continuous data replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it involves moving data and log backups to Amazon S3 for cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
10 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option A is the most cost-effective solution for meeting the DR objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more effective as it uses CloudEndure Disaster Recovery for continuous data replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it involves moving data and log backups to Amazon S3 for cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel