Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon MLA-C01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Posted by Yuki on Jun 13, 2025 at 05:16 PM

A company has a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) application that uses a vector database to store embeddings of documents. The company must migrate the application to AWS and must implement a solution that provides semantic search of text files. The company has already migrated the text repository to an Amazon S3 bucket.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium MLA-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
RO
Rozella 10 months ago
C is definitely the way to go for efficiency!
TA
Tamala 10 months ago
I agree, Kendra is designed for that purpose!
TR
Trina 11 months ago
B could work too, but it feels more complex than necessary.
KI
Kiera 11 months ago
Wait, can Textract really handle semantic searches? Sounds off.
TA
Tamekia 11 months ago
Option C seems like the best fit for semantic search with Kendra.
IL
Ilona 11 months ago
I vaguely recall that Kendra has built-in capabilities for semantic search, which could simplify the implementation.
SH
Shawnna 11 months ago
I feel like using Amazon Textract might not be the best option here since it’s more focused on extracting text rather than semantic search.
DO
Dorsey 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think AWS Batch might be overkill for just generating embeddings. We practiced a similar question with SageMaker before, though.
CR
Cristal 12 months ago
I remember we discussed using Amazon Kendra for semantic search in class. It seems like a good fit for this scenario.
LO
Louisa 12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the question. It's talking about a RAG application, but none of the options seem to directly address that. I'm not sure if I'm missing something or if the question is just not very clear. I might need to ask the instructor for some clarification before I can confidently select an answer.
TI
Tijuana 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. We need to migrate the RAG application to AWS and implement a semantic search solution for the text files in S3. Option C with Kendra seems like the most straightforward approach, as it's designed specifically for this type of use case. I think I'll go with that unless I can find a compelling reason why one of the other options might be better.
MA
Malika 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking for a solution that provides semantic search, but it's not clear to me how the other options like AWS Batch, SageMaker, and Textract would handle that. I might need to do some more research on the capabilities of each service to decide which one is the best fit.
ME
Melita 1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I think I'll go with option C - using the Amazon Kendra S3 connector to ingest the documents and then querying Kendra for the semantic searches. That seems like the most direct solution to the requirements.
RO
Rozella 1 year ago
I'll go with C, but I'm secretly hoping the answer is D just so I can use the word 'asynchronous' in an exam question.
AL
Alyce 1 year ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is a big fan of Kendra. C is definitely the easiest answer, but where's the fun in that?
PA
Pa 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. I think B might be a more flexible solution, allowing for more customization with the SageMaker notebook and Feature Store.
MO
Moon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pa
Yeah, using SageMaker for generating embeddings seems like a flexible solution.
RO
Rolland 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pa
I agree, B sounds like a good option for more customization.
EM
Emelda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pa
Yeah, using SageMaker for generating embeddings seems like a flexible solution.
RH
Rhea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Pa
I agree, B sounds like a good option for more customization.
CO
Corinne 1 year ago
I agree, C is the way to go. Kendra is specifically designed for this kind of use case, and it should handle the semantic search requirements nicely.
RE
Rene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Corinne
I think C is the best option too. Kendra seems like the most efficient solution for this scenario.
JO
Johnetta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Corinne
C) Use the Amazon Kendra S3 connector to ingest the documents from the S3 bucket into Amazon Kendra. Query Amazon Kendra to perform the semantic searches.
HE
Helga 1 year ago
Option C seems like the most straightforward solution here. Kendra's S3 connector should make it easy to ingest the documents and provide semantic search capabilities.
FR
France 1 year ago
↳ replying to Helga
Yeah, Kendra's S3 connector will definitely simplify the process of ingesting the documents and performing semantic searches.
ZO
Zoila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Helga
I agree, using Amazon Kendra for semantic search sounds like the best approach for this scenario.
RO
Rory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Helga
Option C seems like the most straightforward solution here. Kendra's S3 connector should make it easy to ingest the documents and provide semantic search capabilities.
TI
Timothy 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Using SageMaker for generating embeddings seems like a solid approach.
LI
Lizbeth 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the way to go. Amazon Kendra is specifically designed for semantic searches.
FR
Frank 1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice because it uses AWS Batch and Glue for processing and storing embeddings.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel