Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam MLA-C01 Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's MLA-C01 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All MLA-C01 Questions]

An ML engineer needs to implement a solution to host a trained ML model. The rate of requests to the model will be inconsistent throughout the day.

The ML engineer needs a scalable solution that minimizes costs when the model is not in use. The solution also must maintain the model's capacity to respond to requests during times of peak usage.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Quentin
3 days ago
Option A is the clear choice here. Lambda functions can scale up and down automatically, and you don't have to worry about managing any infrastructure. Plus, it's probably the cheapest solution, which is key when the model's not in use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
9 days ago
I see both points, but I personally think option D is more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
16 days ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it can adjust the number of instances dynamically based on metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
27 days ago
As a self-proclaimed 'ML Guru', I can tell you that option B is the way to go. ECS Fargate is like the Ferrari of container orchestration, and it'll handle those peak loads like a champ.
upvoted 0 times
Derick
15 days ago
I agree, ECS Fargate is definitely a solid choice for handling peak loads efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissa
30 days ago
I'd go with C. Deploying multiple copies of the model to the SageMaker endpoint and using an ALB to load balance seems like a great way to handle the inconsistent traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it can automatically scale based on the number of requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
1 months ago
Option D seems the most suitable. The ability to dynamically scale the SageMaker endpoint based on CloudWatch metrics is exactly what the problem statement is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Maia
4 days ago
I agree, having the flexibility to adjust the number of instances based on real-time metrics is crucial for handling varying request rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
5 days ago
Yes, it's important to have a solution that can handle varying request rates throughout the day without incurring unnecessary costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
8 days ago
Option D seems the most suitable. The ability to dynamically scale the SageMaker endpoint based on CloudWatch metrics is exactly what the problem statement is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
13 days ago
I agree, having the model automatically adjust its capacity based on usage will help minimize costs when the model is not in use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
30 days ago
Option D seems the most suitable. The ability to dynamically scale the SageMaker endpoint based on CloudWatch metrics is exactly what the problem statement is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel