New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon DOP-C02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C02 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 4
[All DOP-C02 Questions]

A company requires that its internally facing web application be highly available. The architecture is made up of one Amazon EC2 web server instance and one NAT instance that provides outbound internet access for updates and accessing public data.

Which combination of architecture adjustments should the company implement to achieve high availability? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kattie
2 months ago
B is a must, can't rely on just one instance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 months ago
I think A and C might work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
3 months ago
Definitely B and D for high availability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
3 months ago
Not sure about E, seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
3 months ago
Surprised that NAT gateways are even an option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
3 months ago
I feel like option D makes sense because it talks about having a NAT gateway in each Availability Zone, but I’m not sure if that's the best approach compared to option E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
3 months ago
I think replacing the NAT instance with a NAT gateway is crucial, but I can't recall if it should span multiple Availability Zones or just one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option C might be relevant since it mentions an Application Load Balancer, which we practiced in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
4 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using multiple Availability Zones for high availability, so I think options A and B could be good choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
4 months ago
Replacing the NAT instance with a multi-AZ NAT gateway seems like a good way to improve redundancy. I'll make sure to pair that with the web server changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
4 months ago
The CloudWatch alarm option sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for high availability. I'll need to think that one through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Adding the NAT instance to an Auto Scaling group and creating additional web servers with a load balancer should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the NAT instance. Should I focus more on making the web server highly available?
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward high availability question. I'll start by considering the options that involve redundancy across Availability Zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
6 months ago
Replacing the NAT instance with a NAT gateway that spans multiple Availability Zones could also improve availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
6 months ago
Ah, the classic 'how to make your infrastructure more robust than a tank' question. B and E, obviously.
upvoted 0 times
Theodora
5 months ago
E) Replace the NAT instance with a NAT gateway that spans multiple Availability Zones. Update the route tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
5 months ago
B) Create additional EC2 instances spanning multiple Availability Zones. Add an Application Load Balancer to split the load between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Niesha
6 months ago
That makes sense, spreading the load between multiple instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
7 months ago
I believe creating additional EC2 instances and adding an Application Load Balancer would also be a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
7 months ago
I agree with Niesha. That would help with high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
7 months ago
This is a no-brainer, B and D all the way. I'd rather not have my web app go down like a lead balloon.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
7 months ago
B and E. NAT gateway, the MVP of high availability. Who needs a NAT instance anyway?
upvoted 0 times
Mel
5 months ago
Configuring an Application Load Balancer in front of the EC2 instance and setting up CloudWatch alarms is crucial for recovering the instance upon failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
6 months ago
Having additional EC2 instances spanning multiple Availability Zones with an Application Load Balancer is a great way to split the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
6 months ago
Adding the NAT instance to an EC2 Auto Scaling group that spans multiple Availability Zones is also important for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
7 months ago
I agree, using a NAT gateway that spans multiple Availability Zones is definitely a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dylan
7 months ago
Hmm, C and D. Recover the EC2 instance? Sounds like a party trick I gotta see!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
7 months ago
I was thinking B and E. Gotta love that multi-AZ NAT gateway action!
upvoted 0 times
Jamie
6 months ago
User 1: I think B and E are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmed
7 months ago
B and D for sure. Can't have a single point of failure for that NAT instance!
upvoted 0 times
Glenna
7 months ago
Agreed, having multiple EC2 instances across Availability Zones and using NAT gateways will definitely improve our high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
7 months ago
B and D are definitely the way to go. We need to spread the load and eliminate that single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Niesha
7 months ago
I think we should add the NAT instance to an EC2 Auto Scaling group and update the route tables.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel