MENU
An online retail company based in the United States plans to expand its operations to Europe and Asia in the next six months. Its product currently runs on Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer. The instances run in an Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling group across multiple Availability Zones. All data is stored in an Amazon Aurora database instance.
When the product is deployed in multiple regions, the company wants a single product catalog across all regions, but for compliance purposes, its customer information and purchases must be kept in each region.
How should the company meet these requirements with the LEAST amount of application changes?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium DOP-C02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
DE
Devora
10 months ago
A seems like overkill for just a product catalog.
EL
Ellen
10 months ago
I think C is better for consistency with Aurora.
KE
Kerrie
10 months ago
Option B sounds solid for global tables!
LA
Lashawnda
11 months ago
Wait, can we really use DynamoDB for customer data?
JU
Juliann
11 months ago
I agree with B, it keeps things simple and efficient!
CR
Cristy
11 months ago
I vaguely recall that using Aurora for the catalog could simplify things, but I’m not clear on how it would integrate with DynamoDB for customer data.
IS
Isadora
11 months ago
I feel like option B makes sense since it keeps customer info regional, but I’m not entirely confident about the performance implications.
VA
Vashti
11 months ago
I think using Aurora with read replicas could work for the product catalog, but I’m uncertain about how it handles compliance for customer data.
MU
Murray
12 months ago
I remember we discussed using global tables in DynamoDB for similar scenarios, but I'm not sure if that's the best fit here.
CR
Cristal
12 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The solution is all about leveraging the right AWS services to meet the business needs. I just need to make sure I fully understand the tradeoffs of each option.
FA
Fallon
1 year ago
Whoa, lots of moving parts here. I'm a bit overwhelmed trying to juggle the regional requirements, data separation, and minimizing application changes. I'll need to take a deep breath and tackle this step-by-step.
AR
Arthur
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is finding a way to centralize the product catalog while keeping the customer data localized. Let me walk through each option...
FR
Francene
1 year ago
Hmm, keeping the product catalog separate from the customer data is an interesting challenge. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of the different database options to determine the most efficient approach.
LY
Lyndia
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully to find the best solution with the least amount of application changes.
BE
Bettina
1 year ago
Option C gets my vote. Keeping the catalog in one place makes sense, and the regional Aurora instances for cusDaner data is a smart way to meet compliance.
GI
Giovanna
1 year ago
D is interesting, but I'm not sure I'd want to mix Aurora and DynamoDB for something this critical. Stick with one database technology, I say.
AR
Aron
1 year ago
Haha, option A with Redshift and DynamoDB? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Not the most elegant solution if you ask me.
AL
Alonso
1 year ago
Yeah, it might be better to go with option C and use Aurora with read replicas for the product catalog.
MA
Maybelle
1 year ago
I agree, using Redshift and DynamoDB together seems like an odd choice.
DA
Dan
1 year ago
Option B with DynamoDB global tables for the catalog seems like a simple and scalable solution. Plus, I like how it separates the cusDaner data by region.
BR
Britt
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice. Using Aurora read replicas for the product catalog ensures a single source of truth, while having local Aurora instances for customer data keeps it compliant.
AL
Alisha
1 year ago
True, it ultimately depends on the specific needs and priorities of the company.
HE
Heidy
1 year ago
That could work too, but having a single source of truth for the product catalog with Aurora read replicas is a strong argument for option C.
ED
Edgar
1 year ago
But wouldn't using Amazon DynamoDB global tables for the product catalog and regional tables for customer data be simpler?
KA
Katlyn
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient solution.
JE
Jenelle
1 year ago
I think option A could also work, it provides a good separation of data.
WI
Willie
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option C, it seems like a good compromise.
SH
Shelton
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more suitable.
IN
In
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice.