New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon DOP-C02 Exam - Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's DOP-C02 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All DOP-C02 Questions]

A company is examining its disaster recovery capability and wants the ability to switch over its daily operations to a secondary AWS Region. The company uses AWS CodeCommit as a source control tool in the primary Region.

A DevOps engineer must provide the capability for the company to develop code in the secondary Region. If the company needs to use the secondary Region, developers can add an additional remote URL to their local Git configuration.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The best solution to meet the disaster recovery capability and allow developers to switch over to a secondary AWS Region for code development is option A. This involves creating aCodeCommit repositoryin the secondary Region and setting up anAWS CodeBuild projectto perform a Git mirror operation of the primary Region's CodeCommit repository to the secondary Region's repository. AnAWS Lambda functionis then created to invoke the CodeBuild project.Additionally, anAmazon EventBridge ruleis configured to react to merge events in the primary Region's CodeCommit repository and invoke the Lambda function12.This setup ensures that the secondary Region's repository is always up-to-date with the primary repository, allowing for a seamless transition in case of a disaster recovery event1.


AWS CodeCommit User Guide on resilience and disaster recovery1.

AWS Documentation on monitoring CodeCommit events in Amazon EventBridge and Amazon CloudWatch Events2.

by Denise at Feb 10, 2024, 04:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DOP-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Catrice
3 months ago
Not sure about D, seems a bit complicated for just a remote setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards C, it sounds more streamlined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
3 months ago
Wait, why not just use CodePipeline for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
4 months ago
I think B is a better choice, S3 is super reliable!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
4 months ago
Option A seems solid with the CodeBuild and Lambda setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
4 months ago
I feel like option C could work too since it mentions CodePipeline, but I'm not sure about the Cross-Region stage part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether using S3 in option B is necessary. I thought CodeCommit could handle the mirroring directly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
4 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar because it involves EventBridge and Lambda, which we practiced in a similar scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having a mirror setup for CodeCommit, but I'm not sure if using CodeBuild is the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this. I've worked with similar disaster recovery setups before, so I think I can apply that experience here. I'll just need to double-check that I'm meeting all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. There are a lot of moving parts, and I want to make sure I don't miss any important details. I'll need to think through each option carefully and consider the pros and cons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the details here. I'll need to carefully read through the question again and make sure I understand all the different components involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I think I have a good handle on the key requirements and can work through this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a solid strategy for this. The key is setting up the right AWS services to mirror the primary CodeCommit repo to the secondary Region. I'll focus on the specific steps needed to make that happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question on integrating Spark with SageMaker. I'm confident I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. I know UML is a modeling language, but I'm not sure how it aligns with the IT4IT Service Lifecycle Data Object. I'll have to read the question more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
5 months ago
This one seems straightforward. I'd go with HTTPS since it's the protocol used for secure web transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The access list is restricting the BGP neighborships, so the correct answer is C - the router cannot form BGP neighborships with any device that is matched by the access list named "BGP".
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
2 years ago
I still prefer Option A because it specifically addresses the need for mirroring the CodeCommit repository for disaster recovery purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
2 years ago
That's true, Alease. Option C does involve using CodeArtifact, which could provide a reliable method for storing code in the secondary Region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 years ago
I'm not sure. Option C also looks like a good solution with CodePipeline and CodeArtifact involved. It could be a viable option as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
2 years ago
I agree with Bernardo. Option A seems to be the most efficient way to ensure the company can develop code in the secondary Region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
2 years ago
I think option A is the best solution because it involves creating a CodeCommit repository in the secondary Region and using CodeBuild to mirror the repository.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
2 years ago
Ha, yeah, the CodeArtifact approach is a bit like using a bazooka to kill a fly. I think we can stick with the good ol' CodeCommit mirroring in option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
2 years ago
I agree, option A looks like the best fit. Although, I do wonder if the S3 bucket approach in option B might be a bit simpler to implement. Hmm, decisions, decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
2 years ago
Alright, I think we've got a consensus on option A. Let's go with that and hope the examiners don't try to trick us with any sneaky follow-up questions!
upvoted 0 times
Olene
2 years ago
Fingers crossed that the exam questions are straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
2 years ago
Agreed, understanding the architecture is key to implementing it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 years ago
Let's make sure we are familiar with each component and its role in the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
2 years ago
It's always good to be prepared for any scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
2 years ago
The combination of CodeCommit, CodeBuild, Lambda, and EventBridge is solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
2 years ago
I agree, it covers all the necessary steps for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
2 years ago
Option A seems like the most complete solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tenesha
2 years ago
Ooh, option C with the CodeArtifact repo is an interesting twist. That could provide an extra layer of redundancy, but might be overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel