Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 58 Discussion

A company is running a reporting web server application on Amazon EC2 instances. The application runs once every week and once again at the end of the month. The EC2 instances can be shut down when they are not in use.What is the MOST cost-effective billing model for this use case?
D) On-Demand Instances
A) Standard Reserved Instances
B) Convertible Reserved Instances
C) On-Demand Capacity Reservations

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's CLF-C02 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 4
[All CLF-C02 Questions]

A company is running a reporting web server application on Amazon EC2 instances. The application runs once every week and once again at the end of the month. The EC2 instances can be shut down when they are not in use.

What is the MOST cost-effective billing model for this use case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

For a reporting application that runs only periodically, On-Demand Instances are the most cost-effective choice because they allow the company to pay only for the compute capacity used, without long-term commitments. Reserved Instances are less flexible due to the need for upfront payment or long-term contracts, which would not be cost-effective given the application's intermittent usage. On-Demand Capacity Reservations would also be more costly, as they hold capacity regardless of usage.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Linwood
1 day ago
I think D is the best choice. Only running weekly, so why commit?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
7 days ago
Standard Reserved Instances could be a good option if they plan to use it long-term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
12 days ago
Wait, can you really shut down EC2 and not get charged?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
17 days ago
I think On-Demand is the way to go for weekly usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
22 days ago
I disagree, Reserved Instances might save more in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
27 days ago
Definitely On-Demand Instances, they only pay for what they use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
1 month ago
On-Demand seems right since they only run weekly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 month ago
No way, Reserved Instances are way too expensive for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 month ago
Surprised that On-Demand is the best choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
I think Reserved Instances could save more in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
2 months ago
Definitely On-Demand Instances for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
2 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the Reserved Instances options. Wouldn't Standard Reserved Instances lock us into a longer commitment?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
2 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice one where we discussed the cost benefits of shutting down instances. I think On-Demand is still the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
2 months ago
I remember studying Reserved Instances, but I feel like they might not be cost-effective for such infrequent use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
4 months ago
I think the On-Demand Instances might be the best option since the application only runs weekly and monthly, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel