New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's CLF-C02 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 4
[All CLF-C02 Questions]

A company is building a new application on AWS. The company needs the application to remain available if an individual application component fails.

Which design principle should the company use to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Loose coupling is a design principle that involves reducing dependencies between application components so that they can operate independently. This approach ensures that the failure of one component does not affect the availability of the others, thereby improving the application's fault tolerance and resilience. Disposable resources, automation, and rightsizing are valuable principles in cloud architecture, but they do not directly address the requirement of remaining available despite the failure of an individual component like loose coupling does. References:

AWS Well-Architected Framework - Design Principles


by Shizue at Sep 17, 2024, 11:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLF-C02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Fatima
3 months ago
Disposable resources can be useful too, but not the main focus here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure loose coupling is the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
3 months ago
Rightsizing doesn’t really help with availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
4 months ago
I think automation is just as important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
4 months ago
Loose coupling is key for fault tolerance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
4 months ago
Automation seems important too, but I’m not convinced it directly addresses the availability requirement like loose coupling does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
4 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question on this, and I think loose coupling was the answer because it allows for better fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think disposable resources might be more about scaling rather than availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
5 months ago
I remember we discussed loose coupling in class as a way to ensure that components can fail independently without affecting the whole system.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
5 months ago
Loose coupling seems like the right approach here. If the application components are loosely coupled, then a failure in one component won't bring down the entire application. Gotta love that fault tolerance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'm debating between Loose coupling and Disposable resources. I'll have to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
5 months ago
This looks like a classic question on AWS design principles. I think the answer is Loose coupling, since the question specifically mentions the need for the application to remain available if an individual component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
5 months ago
Automation could also be a good option, since you'd want the system to be able to automatically recover from component failures. But I think Loose coupling is the more direct answer to the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
5 months ago
I'm not completely sure, but I feel like the shared secret might also be important. It's used for securing communications, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 year ago
Loose coupling? That's how I describe my relationship with my alarm clock every morning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 year ago
Rightsizing? I thought that was just my daily struggle with finding the perfect-fitting pants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
1 year ago
Automation? Isn't that just the fancy way of saying 'I let the robots do the work'?
upvoted 0 times
Kallie
1 year ago
That makes sense, thanks for explaining!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
1 year ago
In this case, the company should use loose coupling to ensure availability if a component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
1 year ago
Yes, automation is like having robots do the work for you.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hyman
1 year ago
Disposable resources? I thought that was just my old high school notebooks.
upvoted 0 times
Colette
1 year ago
C: Disposable resources are like my old high school notebooks, not for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
1 year ago
B: Yeah, that way the application can remain available if a component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
1 year ago
A: I think the company should use loose coupling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zita
1 year ago
I'm not sure about loose coupling. Maybe automation could also help in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
1 year ago
Loose coupling? That's what I do with my socks every morning!
upvoted 0 times
German
1 year ago
User 4: Haha, that's a funny way to think about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 year ago
I always try to keep my socks loosely coupled too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 year ago
Yeah, it helps the application stay available if one component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
1 year ago
Loose coupling sounds like a good idea for the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joye
1 year ago
I agree with Launa. Loose coupling helps in ensuring availability even if a component fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
1 year ago
I think the company should use loose coupling to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel