New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's CLF-C02 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 4
[All CLF-C02 Questions]

A company is running a monolithic on-premises application that does not scale and is difficult to maintain. The company has a plan to migrate the application to AWS and divide the application into microservices.

Which best practice of the AWS Well-Architected Framework is the company following with this plan?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lauran
3 months ago
Not sure if this will solve their maintenance issues, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
3 months ago
Loosely coupled dependencies make sense for scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
4 months ago
Wait, are they really going to split it up? Sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
4 months ago
I think they should focus on automation too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
4 months ago
They're definitely going for microservices with this move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought deploying to multiple locations was more about redundancy, not really about migrating to microservices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
4 months ago
I feel like this question is similar to one we practiced on microservices and scaling. I think loosely coupled dependencies might be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about automation in deployment. Could that relate to their migration plan?
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
5 months ago
I think the company is focusing on breaking down the application, so maybe it's about implementing loosely coupled dependencies? That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
5 months ago
I'm a little confused here. The question mentions scaling and maintenance, but none of the answer choices seem to directly address those issues. I'll have to re-read the question and options more closely to figure out the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The company is moving away from a monolithic on-premises application, which is difficult to scale and maintain. Migrating to a microservices architecture on AWS is a clear example of the "Implement loosely coupled dependencies" best practice. That's my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Dividing the application into microservices could relate to a few different best practices, like loose coupling or automation. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the AWS Well-Architected Framework. I think the key is to identify which best practice the company is following by migrating to a microservices architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky networking question. I'll need to carefully read through the details and think through the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
5 months ago
I think market price is about demand and supply...pretty sure that was one of the key definitions we went over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
5 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned how autonomous services might increase composition size, but I'm not confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know Bloom's taxonomy covers different levels of learning, but I'm not totally confident in how to apply it to this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
2 years ago
That's a good point. Automating the deployment process would definitely be important for a microservices-based application. Though I'm curious, do we know if they're actually doing that, or just planning to?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 years ago
Hmm, I was thinking more along the lines of 'Use automation to deploy changes'. Isn't that a key benefit of microservices, the ability to update individual components without affecting the whole system?
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. Microservices are all about breaking down the application into smaller, independent components. That aligns with the 'Implement loosely coupled dependencies' principle from the AWS Well-Architected Framework.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
2 years ago
B) Use automation to deploy changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
2 years ago
That's also important for maintaining the reliability of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
2 years ago
A) Integrate functional testing as part of AWS deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
2 years ago
Exactly! Implementing loosely coupled dependencies is key in microservices architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 years ago
D) Implement loosely coupled dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
2 years ago
B) Use automation to deploy changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arminda
2 years ago
Okay, let's think this through. Dividing the monolithic application into microservices seems like a good move to improve scalability and maintainability. I'd say the best practice they're following is 'Implement loosely coupled dependencies' - that's what microservices are all about, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel