Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

A company is running a monolithic on-premises application that does not scale and is difficult to maintain. The company has a plan to migrate the application to AWS and divide the application into microservices.Which best practice of the AWS Well-Architected Framework is the company following with this plan?
D) Implement loosely coupled dependencies.
A) Integrate functional testing as part of AWS deployment.
B) Use automation to deploy changes.
C) Deploy the application to multiple locations.

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's CLF-C02 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 4
[All CLF-C02 Questions]

A company is running a monolithic on-premises application that does not scale and is difficult to maintain. The company has a plan to migrate the application to AWS and divide the application into microservices.

Which best practice of the AWS Well-Architected Framework is the company following with this plan?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lauran
6 months ago
Not sure if this will solve their maintenance issues, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
7 months ago
Loosely coupled dependencies make sense for scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
7 months ago
Wait, are they really going to split it up? Sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
7 months ago
I think they should focus on automation too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
7 months ago
They're definitely going for microservices with this move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought deploying to multiple locations was more about redundancy, not really about migrating to microservices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
8 months ago
I feel like this question is similar to one we practiced on microservices and scaling. I think loosely coupled dependencies might be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about automation in deployment. Could that relate to their migration plan?
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
8 months ago
I think the company is focusing on breaking down the application, so maybe it's about implementing loosely coupled dependencies? That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
8 months ago
I'm a little confused here. The question mentions scaling and maintenance, but none of the answer choices seem to directly address those issues. I'll have to re-read the question and options more closely to figure out the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The company is moving away from a monolithic on-premises application, which is difficult to scale and maintain. Migrating to a microservices architecture on AWS is a clear example of the "Implement loosely coupled dependencies" best practice. That's my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Dividing the application into microservices could relate to a few different best practices, like loose coupling or automation. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the AWS Well-Architected Framework. I think the key is to identify which best practice the company is following by migrating to a microservices architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky networking question. I'll need to carefully read through the details and think through the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
8 months ago
I think market price is about demand and supply...pretty sure that was one of the key definitions we went over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
8 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned how autonomous services might increase composition size, but I'm not confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know Bloom's taxonomy covers different levels of learning, but I'm not totally confident in how to apply it to this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
2 years ago
That's a good point. Automating the deployment process would definitely be important for a microservices-based application. Though I'm curious, do we know if they're actually doing that, or just planning to?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 years ago
Hmm, I was thinking more along the lines of 'Use automation to deploy changes'. Isn't that a key benefit of microservices, the ability to update individual components without affecting the whole system?
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. Microservices are all about breaking down the application into smaller, independent components. That aligns with the 'Implement loosely coupled dependencies' principle from the AWS Well-Architected Framework.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
2 years ago
B) Use automation to deploy changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
2 years ago
That's also important for maintaining the reliability of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
2 years ago
A) Integrate functional testing as part of AWS deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
2 years ago
Exactly! Implementing loosely coupled dependencies is key in microservices architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 years ago
D) Implement loosely coupled dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
2 years ago
B) Use automation to deploy changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arminda
2 years ago
Okay, let's think this through. Dividing the monolithic application into microservices seems like a good move to improve scalability and maintainability. I'd say the best practice they're following is 'Implement loosely coupled dependencies' - that's what microservices are all about, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel