Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 3 Question 57 Discussion

Which AWS service or feature offers HTTP attack protection to users running public-facing web applications?
D) AWS WAF
A) Security groups
B) Network ACLs
C) AWS Shield Standard

Amazon CLF-C02 Exam - Topic 3 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's CLF-C02 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 3
[All CLF-C02 Questions]

Which AWS service or feature offers HTTP attack protection to users running public-facing web applications?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

AWS WAF is the AWS service or feature that offers HTTP attack protection to users running public-facing web applications. AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps users protect their web applications from common web exploits, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and bot attacks. Users can create custom rules to define the web traffic that they want to allow, block, or count. Users can also use AWS Managed Rules, which are pre-configured rules that are curated and maintained by AWS or AWS Marketplace Sellers. AWS WAF can be integrated with other AWS services, such as Amazon CloudFront, Amazon API Gateway, and Application Load Balancer, to provide comprehensive security for web applications. [AWS WAF Overview]AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner - aws.amazon.com


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Talia
1 day ago
I feel confident about choosing Shield Standard for exams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
7 days ago
Good point! Both have their strengths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
12 days ago
True, but Shield Standard is automatic. Less hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
17 days ago
I’m leaning towards AWS WAF. It’s more customizable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
22 days ago
Yes, but WAF helps with specific HTTP requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
27 days ago
AWS Shield Standard is more focused on attacks, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 month ago
I agree, but AWS WAF also sounds good for web apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 month ago
I think it's AWS Shield Standard. It’s designed for DDoS protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
1 month ago
Not convinced, are these really enough for serious attacks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
Pretty sure it's C) Shield Standard, but WAF is good for custom rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
2 months ago
Wait, I thought Security groups handled that too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
2 months ago
I think D) AWS WAF is more comprehensive though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
Definitely C) AWS Shield Standard for basic protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
2 months ago
I recall that AWS Shield is for DDoS protection, but I wonder if AWS WAF is also a valid choice for HTTP attacks specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
I feel like Security groups and Network ACLs are more about controlling access rather than directly protecting against HTTP attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember practicing a question about web application security, and AWS WAF seemed relevant for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
4 months ago
I think AWS Shield Standard might be the right answer since it specifically mentions protection against DDoS attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel