Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon BDS-C00 Exam - Topic 5 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 5
[All BDS-C00 Questions]

You are managing the AWS account of a big organization. The organization has more than

1000+ employees and they want to provide access to the various services to most of the employees. Which of the below mentioned options is the best possible solution in this case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Annabelle at Aug 29, 2023, 11:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BDS-C00 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Emile
5 months ago
IAM groups are definitely the way to go for better organization!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
5 months ago
Wait, can you really attach IAM roles to an authentication service?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
5 months ago
I think option D could work well with existing authentication systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
6 months ago
I disagree, creating separate IAM users for everyone seems too tedious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
6 months ago
Option C sounds like the most efficient way to manage access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where creating IAM roles was suggested, but I wonder if that would be too complex for managing access for over a thousand users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
6 months ago
I feel like option D might be a good choice since it integrates with existing authentication services, but I can't recall the specifics on how that works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
6 months ago
I think using IAM groups could simplify access management, but I'm not entirely sure if it’s the best option for all departments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
6 months ago
I remember studying IAM best practices, and creating separate users for each employee seems really tedious for such a large organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know working capital has to do with short-term assets and liabilities, but I'm not sure how each of these options would impact it. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
7 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward DAX measure to calculate the percentage of late orders. I'd start by creating a calculated column to flag late orders, then use that in a DIVIDE function to get the percentage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
12 months ago
If I had to manage over 1000 IAM users, I'd need a lot of coffee and a strong sense of patience. Option C is definitely the sanest choice.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
10 months ago
Definitely, IAM groups provide a more organized approach to managing access for a large organization like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
10 months ago
I agree, managing individual IAM users for over 1000 employees would be a nightmare. Grouping them by department is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
10 months ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. Creating IAM groups for each department will make access control much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freeman
12 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Grouping users by department is like herding cats, but it's the most efficient solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Ezekiel
10 months ago
Attaching an IAM role with the organization's authentication service might be too complex for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
10 months ago
Creating separate IAM users for each employee would be too cumbersome in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
11 months ago
I agree, grouping users by department will make it easier to manage access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marilynn
12 months ago
I like how option B uses STS to authenticate users on the EC2 instance. That's a clever way to handle a large user base.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 year ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option C would be more efficient for managing access permissions for a large organization with over 1000 employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
1 year ago
Option A is way too much work for a company with over 1000 employees. Imagine creating and managing all those individual IAM users! No thanks!
upvoted 0 times
Julian
12 months ago
C) The user should create IAM groups as per the organization's departments and add each user to the group for better access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
12 months ago
A) The user should create a separate IAM user for each employee and provide access to them as per the policy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanda
1 year ago
Option D seems like a good idea too. Integrating the organization's authentication service with IAM roles could simplify the process and improve security.
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
11 months ago
D) Attach an IAM role with the organization's authentication service to authorize each user for various AWS services
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
11 months ago
C) The user should create IAM groups as per the organization's departments and add each user to the group for better access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
11 months ago
A) The user should create a separate IAM user for each employee and provide access to them as per the policy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more suitable as it provides individual access to each employee and ensures better security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 year ago
I think option C is the best solution. Creating IAM groups based on the organization's departments and adding each user to the appropriate group will make it easier to manage access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 year ago
I think option C is the best solution because it allows for better access control by organizing users into groups based on departments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel