Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon BDS-C00 Exam - Topic 3 Question 108 Discussion

Your Devops team is responsible for a multi-tier, Windows-based web application consisting of web servers, Amazon RDS database instances, and a load balancer behind Amazon Route53. You have been asked by your manager to build a cost-effective rolling deployment solution for this web application.What method should you use?
A) Re-deploy your application on an AWS OpsWorks stack. Use the AWS OpsWorks clone stack feature to allow updates between duplicate stacks
B) Re-deploy your application on Elastic BeanStalk and take advantage of Elastic BeanStalk rolling updates
C) Re-deploy your application using an AWS CloudFormation template, launch a new AWS CloudFormation stack during each deployment, and then tear down the old stack
D) Re-deploy your application using an AWS CloudFormation template. Use AWS CloudFormation rolling deployment policies, create a new policy for your AWS CloudFormation stack, and initiate an update stack operation to deploy new code

Amazon BDS-C00 Exam - Topic 3 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 3
[All BDS-C00 Questions]

Your Devops team is responsible for a multi-tier, Windows-based web application consisting of web servers, Amazon RDS database instances, and a load balancer behind Amazon Route53. You have been asked by your manager to build a cost-effective rolling deployment solution for this web application.

What method should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Valentin at Nov 18, 2024, 07:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BDS-C00 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Chi
6 months ago
D looks solid, especially with the update stack operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
6 months ago
OpsWorks is outdated, stick with Elastic Beanstalk!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
7 months ago
Wait, can CloudFormation really handle rolling deployments?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
7 months ago
I disagree, D seems more flexible with the policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
7 months ago
I think option B is the best choice for rolling updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
7 months ago
I believe D is the right answer since it mentions using CloudFormation rolling deployment policies, which I think we practiced in one of the mock exams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
7 months ago
I feel like OpsWorks could work, but I don't have a clear picture of how the clone stack feature operates in a rolling deployment scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
8 months ago
I think using CloudFormation for rolling deployments sounds familiar, but I can't recall the specifics about the policies. Did we cover that in our last practice session?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
8 months ago
I remember studying AWS Elastic Beanstalk for rolling updates, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice for a multi-tier application like this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option D is the way to go here. Using CloudFormation's rolling deployment policies will give us the control and flexibility we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. I'll go with option B and use Elastic Beanstalk's rolling updates feature. That seems like the most straightforward and cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the different options to determine the most cost-effective rolling deployment solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go, but I'm just wondering... do the CloudFormation policies come with a complimentary DJ booth? Asking for a friend.
upvoted 0 times
Jani
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, I agree. CloudFormation rolling deployment policies are great for managing updates efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
1 year ago
User 2: Haha, I don't think CloudFormation policies come with a DJ booth, but that would be cool!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
1 year ago
User 1: Option D is definitely the best choice for a cost-effective rolling deployment solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loise
1 year ago
Option C, all the way! Tearing down the old stack and launching a new one feels like the most bulletproof approach. Plus, I get to say 'tear down' and that's just fun.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
1 year ago
Hold up, did you say 'Windows-based web application'? I think I'll go with option A and use the OpsWorks clone stack feature. Windows and I don't really get along.
upvoted 0 times
Brock
12 months ago
Definitely, let's go with that option and make our lives easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
12 months ago
Definitely, OpsWorks clone stack feature seems like the best option for a Windows-based web application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
1 year ago
I think so too. It's probably the most cost-effective solution for our deployment needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
1 year ago
Yeah, I think using OpsWorks clone stack feature will make the deployment process smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
1 year ago
I agree, Windows can be tricky. OpsWorks clone stack feature sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. Option A with OpsWorks clone stack feature sounds like the best choice for a Windows-based web application.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option D. Using CloudFormation's rolling deployment policies seems like a more customizable approach.
upvoted 0 times
Carma
1 year ago
I agree, CloudFormation rolling deployment policies seem like the way to go for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
1 year ago
Option D sounds like a good choice. It allows for more control over the deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darrin
1 year ago
Hmm, option B sounds like a good choice. Elastic Beanstalk's rolling updates would make the deployment process a lot smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
1 year ago
I'm not sure, I think option B could also work well for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
I agree with Nakisha, option D seems like the most efficient method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
1 year ago
I think option D sounds like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel