New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon BDS-C00 Exam - Topic 12 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 12
[All BDS-C00 Questions]

A medical record filing system for a government medical fund is using an Amazon S3 bucket to archive documents related to patients. Every patient visit to a physician creates a new file, which can add up to millions of files each month. Collection of these files from each physician is handled via a batch process that runs every night using AWS Data Pipeline. This is sensitive data, so the data and any associated metadata must be encrypted at rest.

Auditors review some files on a quarterly basis to see whether the records are maintained according to regulations. Auditors must be able to locate any physical file in the S3 bucket or a given data, patient, or physician. Auditors spend a signification amount of time locating such files.

What is the most cost-and time-efficient collection methodology in this situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Chanel at Aug 09, 2023, 02:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BDS-C00 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dorcas
3 months ago
Agree, the auditors need a better way to find files quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
3 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize the volume was that high!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
4 months ago
Not sure if Redshift is the best choice for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
4 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense for metadata tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
4 months ago
Sounds like a lot of files to manage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the options, but I think separating files by physician could help auditors a lot, so maybe B or C?
upvoted 0 times
...
King
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to decide between using DynamoDB and Redshift for metadata storage. I think DynamoDB is more suited for this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think using Amazon Kinesis might be overkill for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using metadata for efficient file retrieval, so option C sounds promising.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think I'll go with option B - configure an error handling process that displays the error message and sends an email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question mentions buyers requesting bids, quotes, tenders, or proposals through procurement documents. Based on that, I'm guessing the correct answer is "Solicitations".
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
10 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to deal with this many files on a daily basis. That must be a real headache for the IT team!
upvoted 0 times
Mindy
8 months ago
C: It must be a huge challenge for the IT team to ensure everything is stored and encrypted properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 months ago
B: Definitely! I can't imagine the amount of work that goes into organizing all that data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
9 months ago
C: Using Amazon S3 event notifications to populate a DynamoDB table seems like a good way to organize the files efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
9 months ago
B: Definitely! I can't imagine having to locate specific files for auditors on a regular basis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
9 months ago
A: I agree, managing millions of files each month sounds like a nightmare.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
9 months ago
A: I agree, managing millions of files each month sounds like a nightmare.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
10 months ago
Putting the metadata in Redshift instead of DynamoDB is an interesting twist. I wonder if that would be more efficient for the auditing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
10 months ago
Partitioning the files in DynamoDB based on the month and year could be a good way to make it easier for auditors to locate specific files. I like that approach.
upvoted 0 times
Celeste
8 months ago
It definitely seems like a cost-effective and efficient solution for the auditors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
8 months ago
C) Use Amazon S3 event notifications to populate an Amazon DynamoDB table with metadata about every file loaded to Amazon S3, and partition them based on the month and year of the file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
8 months ago
That sounds like a smart way to organize the files for easier access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
8 months ago
C) Use Amazon S3 event notifications to populate an Amazon DynamoDB table with metadata about every file loaded to Amazon S3, and partition them based on the month and year of the file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
8 months ago
D: I agree, having a structured way to organize the files would save time for auditors during their quarterly reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
9 months ago
C: Using Amazon kinesis to get the data feeds directly from physicians and then storing them in Amazon S3 with folders separated per physician could also be efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
10 months ago
B: Yeah, that would definitely make it easier for auditors to locate specific files when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
10 months ago
A: I think using Amazon S3 event notifications to populate an Amazon DynamoDB table with metadata and partitioning based on the month and year is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hildred
10 months ago
Using Kinesis to get the data feeds directly from the physicians sounds like a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's the most cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
Vanna
9 months ago
B: Yeah, that could help with organizing the files efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
10 months ago
A: I think using Amazon S3 event notifications to populate an Amazon DynamoDB table with metadata about every file loaded to Amazon S3 is a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josephine
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky question. I'll have to think carefully about the cost and time efficiency of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
10 months ago
That's a good point, option C could indeed save time for auditors by organizing files based on month and year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it uses Amazon S3 event notifications to populate a DynamoDB table with metadata.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it directly gets data feeds from physicians and stores them in folders per physician.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel