Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Amazon BDS-C00 Exam - Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

You are configuring your company's application to use Auto Scaling and need to move user state information. Which of the following AWS services provides a shared data store with durability and low latency?
A) Amazon Simple Storage Service
B) Amazon DynamoDB
C) Amazon EC2 instance storage
D) AWS ElasticCache Memcached

Amazon BDS-C00 Exam - Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 1
[All BDS-C00 Questions]

You are configuring your company's application to use Auto Scaling and need to move user state information. Which of the following AWS services provides a shared data store with durability and low latency?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Dierdre at Sep 09, 2024, 01:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BDS-C00 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ernest
6 months ago
Wait, EC2 instance storage? That doesn't sound durable at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
6 months ago
I agree, DynamoDB is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
7 months ago
Amazon S3 is not the right choice here, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
7 months ago
I thought ElasticCache was better for low latency?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
7 months ago
Definitely DynamoDB for shared data store!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
7 months ago
I have a vague memory that S3 is more for object storage, so I don't think it fits this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between DynamoDB and ElasticCache. I think DynamoDB is the better option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like EC2 instance storage is more temporary and not really a shared data store.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
8 months ago
I remember studying about data stores, and I think DynamoDB is designed for low latency and durability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. What exactly do they mean by "user state information"? Is that the same as session data? If so, then DynamoDB could be a good choice, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. We need a shared data store, so that rules out EC2 instance storage. S3 has durability, but I'm not sure about the latency. DynamoDB does sound like the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
8 months ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward question. The key is that we need a shared data store with durability and low latency, which points to DynamoDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know DynamoDB is a NoSQL database, but I'm not sure if it has the low latency we're looking for. Maybe EC2 instance storage could work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. The question mentions AJAX and the user tabbing out of each field, so I'm wondering if the Request scope might also be a valid option since the data is being updated in real-time. I'll need to think this through a bit more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
1 year ago
If this was a test on AWS dad jokes, I'd be acing it. But alas, it's just about databases and stuff. Where's the fun in that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the correct answer isn't hidden behind a paywall or something. AWS can be tricky like that, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
11 months ago
ElasticCache Memcached could also work for low latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
11 months ago
D) AWS ElasticCache Memcached
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
11 months ago
I think DynamoDB is the right choice for shared data store.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 year ago
B) Amazon DynamoDB
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmed
1 year ago
Hmm, EC2 instance storage is temporary and not shared, so that's a no-go. I'm torn between A and B, but I'll go with B since S3 is more for object storage.
upvoted 0 times
Iraida
12 months ago
User 3: Yeah, Amazon Simple Storage Service is more for object storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
1 year ago
User 2: Good choice, it provides a shared data store with durability and low latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
1 year ago
User 1: I think I'll go with Amazon DynamoDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Youlanda
1 year ago
I was leaning towards D, but then I remembered ElastiCache Memcached is more for caching and not really a durable data store. Good thing I double-checked the options!
upvoted 0 times
Bette
12 months ago
D) AWS ElasticCache Memcached
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
12 months ago
C) Amazon EC2 instance storage
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
12 months ago
B) Amazon DynamoDB
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
12 months ago
A) Amazon Simple Storage Service
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
Option B seems like the way to go for a shared data store with durability and low latency. DynamoDB is designed for that kind of use case.
upvoted 0 times
Maybelle
1 year ago
I think Amazon Simple Storage Service could also work for storing user state information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
I agree, DynamoDB is a good choice for shared data store with durability and low latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosendo
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Amazon Simple Storage Service could also be a good option for storing user state information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
1 year ago
I agree with Reuben. DynamoDB is a good choice for shared data store in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Amazon DynamoDB because it provides durability and low latency.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel