Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Alibaba Exam ACA-Developer Topic 6 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Developer exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 6
[All ACA-Developer Questions]

A Developer is asked to implement a caching layer in front of RDS. Cached content is expensive to regenerate in case of service failure. Which implementation below would work while maintaining maximum uptime?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Serina
28 days ago
Ah, the classic 'cache or HBase' dilemma. I wonder if they'll also consider implementing a blockchain-based microservices architecture to really make things interesting.
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
10 days ago
B: Install Redis on an ECS instance
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
22 days ago
A: Implement ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colton
1 months ago
ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode could work, but I think the Cluster Mode is a better choice to handle the expensive cached content in case of service failures.
upvoted 0 times
Emile
22 days ago
B: I agree, it would help maintain maximum uptime for the cached content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
23 days ago
A: I think implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krissy
1 months ago
Installing Redis on an ECS instance might work, but I'm worried about managing the Redis server and ensuring high uptime. The managed ApsaraDB for Redis solution seems more appealing.
upvoted 0 times
Ahmed
4 days ago
D: Migrating the ROS database to HBase seems like a drastic solution compared to using ApsaraDB for Redis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
11 days ago
C: ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode could also work well for maintaining high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
23 days ago
B: I agree, managing a Redis server on an ECS instance could be risky in terms of uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
28 days ago
A: I think implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode would be the best option for maximum uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenda
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is the safest choice for maintaining maximum uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode is more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
2 months ago
I'm not sure about migrating the RDS database to HBase just to save the cache layer. That seems like overkill and could introduce more complexity than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Mila
24 days ago
B: I agree, it would provide high availability and scalability for the caching layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 months ago
A: I think implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
2 months ago
Implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode sounds like the way to go. It'll provide high availability and scalability for the caching layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
2 months ago
I think option A would work best because ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode provides high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also work well since ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode is also a good choice for caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
2 months ago
I agree with Jennifer, option A seems like the most reliable choice for maintaining uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
2 months ago
I think option A would work best because ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode provides high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel