Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Alibaba Discussions
Exam ACA-Database Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion
Alibaba Exam ACA-Database Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion
Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Database exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 5
[All ACA-Database Questions]
What is the maximum number of read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster?
A
1
B
5
C
10
D
15
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A, B, D, E
by
Tawny
at
Nov 13, 2024, 05:44 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium ACA-Database Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Margarita
30 days ago
Wait, does this mean I can have a 'polar bear' in my PolarDB cluster? I'm going with B, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted
0
times
...
Paul
1 months ago
This question is making me feel a bit 'polar-ized'. I'll go with A, just to keep things simple.
upvoted
0
times
Nakisha
4 days ago
I think the answer is A) 1.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Ellen
1 months ago
Ha! I bet the developers were feeling a bit 'polar' when they set the max at 15. I'm sticking with D just to see what happens.
upvoted
0
times
Margurite
11 days ago
I'm curious too, I'll go with D and see if it's 15.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kenny
15 days ago
I'm going with option C, 10 read-only nodes.
upvoted
0
times
...
Stefanie
1 months ago
I think the max number of read-only nodes is 10.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Macy
2 months ago
Wait, 15 read-only nodes? That sounds like a lot. I'm going to go with C, 10 seems more reasonable for a PolarDB cluster.
upvoted
0
times
Susy
1 months ago
Yeah, 15 read-only nodes does sound like a lot. I think C, 10, is the right choice.
upvoted
0
times
...
Therese
1 months ago
I agree, 10 read-only nodes does seem like a reasonable number for a PolarDB cluster.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Lorita
2 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm guessing the answer is B, since 5 is a nice round number for a cluster, right?
upvoted
0
times
Alfreda
22 days ago
Thanks for clarifying. I'll remember that for next time.
upvoted
0
times
...
Carman
1 months ago
Exactly, it's not 5. It's 10 read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster.
upvoted
0
times
...
Marleen
1 months ago
Oh, I see. That makes sense. So, it's not B) 5 after all.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kallie
2 months ago
I think the answer is actually C) 10, because PolarDB clusters can have up to 10 read-only nodes.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Irene
2 months ago
I agree with Michel, C) 10 makes sense for better scalability and fault tolerance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Michel
2 months ago
I believe it's C) 10 because having more read-only nodes can improve read performance.
upvoted
0
times
...
Carin
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) 1.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Margarita
30 days agoPaul
1 months agoNakisha
4 days agoEllen
1 months agoMargurite
11 days agoKenny
15 days agoStefanie
1 months agoMacy
2 months agoSusy
1 months agoTherese
1 months agoLorita
2 months agoAlfreda
22 days agoCarman
1 months agoMarleen
1 months agoKallie
2 months agoIrene
2 months agoMichel
2 months agoCarin
2 months ago