Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Alibaba ACA-Database Exam - Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion

What is the maximum number of read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster?
A) 1 and B) 5 and D) 15
C) 10

Alibaba ACA-Database Exam - Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Database exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 5
[All ACA-Database Questions]

What is the maximum number of read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D, E

by Tawny at Nov 13, 2024, 05:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACA-Database Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bok
9 months ago
Are you sure about that? Sounds too high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
9 months ago
Yup, 15 is correct. Solid scaling!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
10 months ago
Wait, really? I thought it was only 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
10 months ago
Totally agree, 15 is the max!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
10 months ago
It's 15 read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
10 months ago
I’m pretty certain it’s 15, but I might be mixing it up with another database system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought it was either 10 or 15, but I can't recall which one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I think the answer was around 5 read-only nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
11 months ago
I think I remember reading that PolarDB can have multiple read-only nodes, but I’m not sure about the exact number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I don't recall discussing the specifics of PolarDB cluster configurations in class. I'll have to make an educated guess on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll start by considering the typical use cases for read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster, then narrow down the options based on that context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with PolarDB clusters. I'll have to think through the potential limits and constraints to determine the maximum number of read-only nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about PolarDB cluster configuration. I'll need to review my notes on the maximum number of read-only nodes allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
1 year ago
Wait, does this mean I can have a 'polar bear' in my PolarDB cluster? I'm going with B, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
1 year ago
This question is making me feel a bit 'polar-ized'. I'll go with A, just to keep things simple.
upvoted 0 times
Inocencia
1 year ago
I believe it's D) 15.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
1 year ago
I'll choose C) 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
1 year ago
I'm going with B) 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellen
1 year ago
Ha! I bet the developers were feeling a bit 'polar' when they set the max at 15. I'm sticking with D just to see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
1 year ago
I'm curious too, I'll go with D and see if it's 15.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
I'm going with option C, 10 read-only nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
1 year ago
I think the max number of read-only nodes is 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Macy
1 year ago
Wait, 15 read-only nodes? That sounds like a lot. I'm going to go with C, 10 seems more reasonable for a PolarDB cluster.
upvoted 0 times
Susy
1 year ago
Yeah, 15 read-only nodes does sound like a lot. I think C, 10, is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
1 year ago
I agree, 10 read-only nodes does seem like a reasonable number for a PolarDB cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorita
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm guessing the answer is B, since 5 is a nice round number for a cluster, right?
upvoted 0 times
Alfreda
1 year ago
Thanks for clarifying. I'll remember that for next time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
1 year ago
Exactly, it's not 5. It's 10 read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
1 year ago
Oh, I see. That makes sense. So, it's not B) 5 after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 year ago
I think the answer is actually C) 10, because PolarDB clusters can have up to 10 read-only nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irene
1 year ago
I agree with Michel, C) 10 makes sense for better scalability and fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
1 year ago
I believe it's C) 10 because having more read-only nodes can improve read performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) 1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel