U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Alibaba ACA-Cloud1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 88 Discussion

Which of the following statements about file uploading to OSS strategy is not correct?
A) All file uploading method provided by Alibaba Cloud OSS service will support resuming from break point.
B) If you are uploading some small files (<1m), you can choose using put method to be able finish uploading in one http request.
C) If you are using OSS to store some log files which are continuously being updated, you better choose streaming method to be able to append to one existing object instead of overwriting.
D) If you need to upload very large file you better use multi-part uploading to get the capability of resuming from break point.

Alibaba ACA-Cloud1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Cloud1 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 3
[All ACA-Cloud1 Questions]

Which of the following statements about file uploading to OSS strategy is not correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Alibaba Cloud OSS service provides different methods for file uploading, such as simple upload, multipart upload, append upload, and resumable upload1. However, not all of these methods support resuming from break point, which is a feature that allows you to resume an interrupted upload from where it left off.The only method that supports resuming from break point is resumable upload, which is based on multipart upload and uses a checkpoint file to record the upload progress2. The other methods do not support resuming from break point, and will either overwrite or append to the existing object if the upload is interrupted and retried.


by Dominga at Jun 15, 2025, 03:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACA-Cloud1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elenor
6 months ago
Wait, are you sure about A? That sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
6 months ago
C seems a bit off to me. Can you really append with streaming?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
6 months ago
A is definitely not correct. Not all methods support resuming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
7 months ago
D is the way to go for large files, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
7 months ago
I agree, B is spot on for small files!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
7 months ago
Multi-part uploading sounds right for large files, but I wonder if there's a limit on file size for the put method too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
7 months ago
I feel like streaming for log files makes sense, but I can't recall if it really allows appending without overwriting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
7 months ago
I remember practicing a question about file sizes and upload methods, and I think the put method is indeed for small files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
8 months ago
I think option A might be the one that's not correct, but I'm not entirely sure if all methods really support resuming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
8 months ago
Resuming from a breakpoint is important for large file uploads, so I'll pay close attention to that aspect in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
8 months ago
Okay, I know the basics of OSS file uploading, so I should be able to eliminate the incorrect statement. Just need to focus on the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
8 months ago
The key is to understand the use cases for each method and match them to the scenario described. I'll need to read the options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between the file uploading methods. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
9 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
11 months ago
I agree with Ahmed. Option B is the correct answer. The other options all seem pretty reasonable to me.
upvoted 0 times
Percy
10 months ago
I agree, put method is efficient for small files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
10 months ago
I think option B is correct. Uploading small files using put method makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Twana
12 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is an OSS expert. They really know how to trip us up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
12 months ago
I agree with Alverta, statement D makes sense for uploading very large files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
12 months ago
I believe the correct statement is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
12 months ago
Option B is the right answer. For small files, the put method is the best choice to finish the upload in a single HTTP request.
upvoted 0 times
Aleshia
11 months ago
It allows you to finish the upload in a single HTTP request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
11 months ago
Yes, for small files, put method is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
11 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerrod
12 months ago
I think option C is not correct. The streaming method is for appending data to an existing object, not for uploading new files.
upvoted 0 times
Margart
11 months ago
You're right. Option C is incorrect. The streaming method is indeed for appending data to an existing object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
11 months ago
I think option C is not correct. The streaming method is for appending data to an existing object, not for uploading new files.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willow
1 year ago
I think the correct statement is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel