Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Alibaba ACA-Cloud1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Cloud1 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 2
[All ACA-Cloud1 Questions]

Which of the following statements to OSS bucket is not correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A bucket is a container for objects in Object Storage Service (OSS). Every user can create more than one bucket, but every bucket should have a unique name in OSS. There is no limitation to the number of objects inside one bucket. However, the bucket name cannot be changed after creation.You cannot customize, change, or request a namespace name change1.If you want to modify an object, you must upload a new object with the same name as the existing one to replace it2.Reference:3: Create a bucket - Object Storage Service - Alibaba Cloud34: Manage objects in a versioning-enabled bucket - Object Storage Service - Alibaba Cloud41: Understanding Object Storage Namespaces - Oracle12: OSS Concepts - Alibaba Object Storage Service Course - Cloud Academy2


by Leigha at Oct 31, 2025, 09:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACA-Cloud1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nichelle
29 days ago
D seems fine, no limits on objects. B is the odd one out for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
1 month ago
C is true, unique names are a must. But B is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
2 months ago
Agreed, B is definitely wrong. Once it's set, it's set!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
2 months ago
I think B is incorrect. You can't change the bucket name after creating it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
2 months ago
No limit on objects? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
Every bucket does need a unique name, that's a fact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
3 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? I thought names could be edited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
3 months ago
I totally agree, that's a common misconception!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
3 months ago
C) Every bucket should have a unique name. Obvious, but important. Gotta keep those buckets organized, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
3 months ago
D) There is no limitation to objects number inside one bucket. Haha, good one! I'm sure my hard drive would beg to differ.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
3 months ago
C) Every bucket should have a unique name. Well, duh! How else would we keep track of all our buckets?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
3 months ago
B) Bucket name can be changed after creation? Really? I thought that was a myth!
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the limitations on objects in a bucket. I thought there was no limit, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
4 months ago
A bucket name can't be changed after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
I recall something about users being able to create multiple buckets, so A seems fine to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like we practiced a question about changing bucket names, and I thought it was not allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
5 months ago
A) Every user can create more than one bucket. Sounds like a recipe for a cluttered mess to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
5 months ago
I think I remember that bucket names have to be unique, so maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
5 months ago
I've got this! The correct answer is C - bucket names must be unique. The other statements are all true about OSS buckets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the options. I'll need to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I believe the key is understanding the limitations and rules around OSS buckets. I'll focus on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. I'll need to review the OSS bucket details again to be confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
6 months ago
I think I know this one. Option C is the correct answer - every bucket must have a unique name.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
8 days ago
Exactly! Option D is also true, no limit on objects in a bucket.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
13 days ago
Right! And option A is true too, multiple buckets are allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
19 days ago
But what about option B? Can we change bucket names?
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
24 days ago
I agree, option C is definitely correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
4 months ago
No, option B is incorrect. Bucket names can't be changed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel