Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Alfresco APSCA Exam - Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

What is an alternative to copying an exported process app zip file and importing manually, when publishing a process app to multiple environments?
D) Use an activiti-admin application to deploy the existing process app from the activiti-app development environment to each activiti-app production environment.
A) Share the database resource of the development activiti-app environment with the production activiti-app environment.
B) Use App Designer 'share' feature to replicate the app to each production activiti-app environment.
C) Export the app as a zip, and copy it to the activiti-app/workflow directory of each production server for automatic publishing.

Alfresco APSCA Exam - Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alfresco's APSCA exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 1
[All APSCA Questions]

What is an alternative to copying an exported process app zip file and importing manually, when publishing a process app to multiple environments?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dominic
12 days ago
But D ensures all settings are preserved. That’s important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
17 days ago
Plus, it keeps everything in sync across environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
22 days ago
I agree with Florencia. Sharing is quick and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
28 days ago
Option C sounds risky. Manual copying can lead to errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
1 month ago
I prefer option D. It’s more efficient for multiple environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
1 month ago
I think option B is the easiest. Just share the app!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
1 month ago
I’ve always used option A, but I’m not sure if it’s the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
2 months ago
Option C is just a manual workaround, not efficient at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
2 months ago
Wait, can you really use the share feature like that? Sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
2 months ago
I disagree, option D seems more reliable for deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
2 months ago
I think option B is the easiest way to share apps across environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 months ago
I’ve always used option A, but I’m curious about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
2 months ago
Option C is just a hassle, manual copying is so outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
3 months ago
Wait, can you really use the share feature like that? Sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
An
4 months ago
I disagree, option D seems more reliable for deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
I think option B is the easiest way to share apps across environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
5 months ago
I feel like option C is just a manual workaround, but I can't remember if it has any advantages over the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option A. Sharing the database resource seems risky, but I can't recall the details of why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think option D might be the best choice since it mentions using an admin application for deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure how the share feature works in App Designer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel