Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AHIP AHM-530 Exam - Topic 6 Question 75 Discussion

Posted by Reena on Oct 07, 2023 at 10:27 AM

If a third party is responsible for injuries to a plan member of the Hope Health Plan, then Hope has a contractual right to file a claim for the resulting healthcare costs against the third party. This contractual right to recovery from the third party is known as

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium AHM-530 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
EL
Eladia 11 months ago
Partial capitation is totally unrelated to this situation.
SH
Shantay 12 months ago
Really? I didn't know they could claim against a third party like that.
TA
Tayna 12 months ago
Subrogation is the right term here, no doubt.
CA
Carin 1 year ago
I thought it was coordination of benefits?
SK
Skye 1 year ago
It's definitely subrogation!
PH
Phil 1 year ago
I’m leaning towards A too, but I’m a bit confused about the other options. Partial capitation doesn’t seem to fit here.
TA
Tamera 1 year ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question like this before, and subrogation definitely sounds familiar. I think that’s the right term.
GR
Gregoria 1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about coordination of benefits. Could that be related?
LA
Layla 1 year ago
I think the answer is A, subrogation. We covered that in class, right? It’s when the insurer steps in to recover costs from a third party.
AM
Amie 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. What exactly is a "remedy provision"? That's not a term I'm familiar with in this context. I'll have to read through it again more closely.
KI
Kip 1 year ago
Okay, I remember learning about subrogation in class. That's when the health plan can go after the third party responsible for the member's injuries to recoup the costs they paid. I think that's the right answer here.
HA
Harrison 1 year ago
Hmm, this one has me a bit stumped. I'm not totally sure about the difference between subrogation, coordination of benefits, and the other options. I'll have to think this through carefully.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. It's definitely subrogation - that's the contractual right for the health plan to recover costs from a third party.
TH
Thersa 1 year ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of network security concepts. I'm pretty confident I know the right answer, but I'll double-check the options just to be sure.
CE
Cecilia 1 year ago
Based on my understanding of Cisco ISE and Stealthwatch, the pXGrid Controller is the node that enables the contextual information sharing. I'm confident in that answer.
GI
Gilma 1 year ago
I think matching the OSPF areas is crucial too; if they're in different areas, they won't form an adjacency.
GO
Goldie 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure we need to use N-fold cross-validation when we don't have enough data to create a separate test set. That's option B, right?
MI
Mirta 1 year ago
Subrogation all the way! Now, if only I could sue the exam writers for giving me a headache with these tricky questions. Where's my legal team when I need them?
KE
Kenny 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mirta
C) Coordination of benefits
MI
Micah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mirta
I agree, subrogation is the way to go in these situations.
BE
Benton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mirta
A) Subrogation
GW
Gwenn 2 years ago
Subrogation, easy peasy. Though I have to say, 'partial capitation' sounds like something straight out of a sci-fi movie. I wonder if that's the 'remedy provision' for when the third party is an alien overlord?
LY
Lynsey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwenn
D) A remedy provision
CA
Carma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwenn
C) Coordination of benefits
RA
Raelene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwenn
B) Partial capitation
CI
Ciara 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwenn
A) Subrogation
IO
Iola 2 years ago
Subrogation, no doubt about it. I can almost picture the lawyers fighting it out in court to recover those healthcare costs. Gotta love the legal jargon in this industry.
CA
Carman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iola
C) Coordination of benefits
AN
Andra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iola
Absolutely, subrogation is the contractual right to recover healthcare costs from a third party. It's a common practice in the industry.
RO
Rozella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iola
A) Subrogation
DO
Donte 2 years ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. At first, I thought it might be coordination of benefits, but subrogation makes more sense in this context. I better brush up on my healthcare terminology before the exam!
BE
Ben 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) Coordination of benefits.
DA
Darrel 2 years ago
I agree with Maynard. Hope Health Plan can recover costs through subrogation.
DO
Dortha 2 years ago
Subrogation is definitely the right answer here. I remember learning about this concept in my healthcare law class. The plan has a contractual right to recover costs from the third party responsible for the member's injuries.
NI
Nieves 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dortha
Yes, it's an important concept in healthcare law to ensure the plan isn't left covering costs for injuries caused by others.
BI
Billye 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dortha
I agree, subrogation is when the plan can recover costs from the third party.
MA
Maynard 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Subrogation.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel