The BBA of 1997 specifies the ways in which a Medicare+Choice plan can establish and use provider networks. A Medicare+Choice plan that operates as a private fee for service (PFFS) plan is allowed to
Option B is the way to go, folks. Limiting provider payments to 115% of the Medicare rate - that's the key thing PFFS plans can do according to the BBA. Now excuse me while I go practice my 'haggling with providers' skills.
Alright, let's see here. I'm going to have to go with option B. It just makes the most sense when it comes to PFFS plan requirements under the BBA of '97. Solid choice, if I do say so myself.
Haha, imagine if PFFS plans could just shift all the risk to the providers. That would be like playing 'hot potato' with Medicare-covered services! But I digress, I'd go with option B.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option C, as PFFS plans can refuse payment to non-network providers. Gotta watch out for those sneaky non-network docs!
I see your point, but I still think A is the correct answer because it makes sense for the plan to limit the size of its network to meet the needs of its enrollees.
Mitsue
13 days agoIra
18 days agoCletus
23 days agoBettina
3 days agoRonald
1 months agoDonette
18 days agoColby
22 days agoLacey
23 days agoAyesha
1 months agoDan
1 months agoGennie
1 months agoSimona
2 months agoTamar
2 months agoMerissa
1 days agoCordelia
8 days agoViva
22 days agoGlory
24 days agoEura
2 months agoSimona
2 months ago