Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AHIP AHM-530 Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Grant Pelham is covered by both a workers' compensation program and a group health plan provided by his employer. The Shipwright Health Plan administers both programs. Mr. Grant was injured while on the job and applied for benefits.Because Mr. Pelham was injured on the job, he is entitled to receive benefits through workers' compensation. Under the terms of the state-mandated exclusive remedy doctrine included in the workers' compensation agreement, Mr. Pelham will most likely be prohibited from
C) Suing his employer for additional benefits
A) Receiving workers' compensation benefits unless he can show that the employer was at fault for his injury
B) Obtaining care from providers who are not members of a workers' compensation network
D) Claiming benefits from both workers' compensation and his group health plan

AHIP AHM-530 Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-530 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 1
[All AHM-530 Questions]

Grant Pelham is covered by both a workers' compensation program and a group health plan provided by his employer. The Shipwright Health Plan administers both programs. Mr. Grant was injured while on the job and applied for benefits.

Because Mr. Pelham was injured on the job, he is entitled to receive benefits through workers' compensation. Under the terms of the state-mandated exclusive remedy doctrine included in the workers' compensation agreement, Mr. Pelham will most likely be prohibited from

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lili at Oct 24, 2022, 01:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-530 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Edna
10 months ago
I thought he could sue if the employer was negligent?
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
11 months ago
B is misleading, he can see non-network providers sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
11 months ago
Wait, can he really not claim both benefits?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
11 months ago
Totally agree, C is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
11 months ago
Workers' comp usually means no suing the employer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
11 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up the details, but I think the exclusive remedy doctrine prevents suing the employer. So, I guess option C sounds right, but I’m not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question about workers' compensation benefits last week. I remember that you can't claim benefits from both the workers' comp and health plan, but I think that was a different context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think workers' compensation is supposed to be the only remedy for job-related injuries. That makes me think option C is correct, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
12 months ago
I remember discussing the exclusive remedy doctrine in class, and I think it means you can't sue your employer for additional benefits. So, I’m leaning towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
12 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The key is to focus on network performance factors that could impact the client-side application, given the remote location of the database server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
12 months ago
I think the key here is to understand how policies are applied in an offline scenario. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the implications of each.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I believe the arbiter's role is to direct the shadow controller to begin managing the platform if the controller fails. That sounds like the most logical answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
12 months ago
I seem to recall that "delay" isn't really relevant for LDAP queries, so maybe it's not a choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel