Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AHIP AHM-520 Exam - Topic 5 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-520 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 5
[All AHM-520 Questions]

Most organizations that obtain group healthcare coverage can be classified as one of three types of groups: employer-employee groups, multiple employer groups, and professional associations. One true statement about these types of groups is that

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Stephanie at Jul 02, 2024, 08:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-520 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Naomi
4 months ago
I thought multiple-employer groups had lower risks, guess I was wrong!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
4 months ago
D seems right, they can't just look at the broker's experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
4 months ago
Wait, C sounds a bit off. Can they really force members to get coverage through the group?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
4 months ago
I disagree with B, public employers can have their own risks too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
5 months ago
A is definitely true, anti-selection is a big concern for those groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
5 months ago
I vaguely recall something about how health plans can consider the broker's experience, but I can't remember the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
5 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this where individual members had to get coverage through their group. I think that might be true for multiple-employer groups too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like private employers do present higher underwriting risks compared to public ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
5 months ago
I remember discussing anti-selection risk in class, and I think it was mentioned that it's generally higher in multiple-employer groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
5 months ago
This question is testing our knowledge of group healthcare coverage, which is an important topic. I'll carefully consider each option and make sure I select the most accurate statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The differences in anti-selection risk and underwriting between the group types are something we've covered extensively in class. I'm going with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding how the underwriting risk differs for the group types. I'm leaning towards option A, but I'll double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key differences between the three group types before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the anti-selection risk for multiple-employer groups and professional associations compared to employer-employee groups. I'll need to review that concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The key things I need to look for are that the consent is in writing, has the right information, and is properly signed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
6 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options. Channel Account and Commerce Portal don't seem to match the requirements, but I'm not sure if Customer Community or Platform Portal is the better fit. I'll need to review the details again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
6 months ago
Okay, let me see. Scheduled messages and batched messages seem like they could be supported, but I'm not sure about the others. I'll try to eliminate the ones that don't seem as likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
10 months ago
Ah, the joys of group healthcare coverage. Where the rules are made up and the points don't matter. Time to start my own professional association of professional association experts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
10 months ago
Wait, so health insurance companies are actually allowed to consider risk factors? I thought they just threw darts at a board to determine premiums.
upvoted 0 times
Elenora
9 months ago
D) I health plan is prohibited, when evaluating the risks represented by a professional association, from considering the industry experience of the agent or broker that sells a group plan to the association
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
9 months ago
C) Individual members of a multiple-employer group or a professional association typically are required to obtain healthcare coverage through the group or association
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
10 months ago
B) Private employers typically present a higher underwriting risk to health plans than do public employers
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
10 months ago
A) Anti selection risk is higher for both multiple-employer groups and professional associations than it is for an employer-employee group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
10 months ago
Option D is a bit of a head-scratcher. Why would a health plan be prohibited from considering the industry experience of the agent or broker? Seems like that would be relevant information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
10 months ago
Hmm, this one's a tough one. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'd better double-check my understanding of public and private employer risk.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
9 months ago
C) Individual members of a multiple-employer group or a professional association typically are required to obtain healthcare coverage through the group or association
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
10 months ago
B) Private employers typically present a higher underwriting risk to health plans than do public employers
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
10 months ago
A) Anti selection risk is higher for both multiple-employer groups and professional associations than it is for an employer-employee group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gabriele
11 months ago
Option A seems plausible, but I'm not sure if that's the best answer. The anti-selection risk could vary depending on the specific group.
upvoted 0 times
Shawn
10 months ago
Option A seems plausible, but I'm not sure if that's the best answer. The anti-selection risk could vary depending on the specific group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
10 months ago
B) Private employers typically present a higher underwriting risk to health plans than do public employers
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
10 months ago
A) Anti selection risk is higher for both multiple-employer groups and professional associations than it is for an employer-employee group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlene
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be D. Health plans can't consider the industry experience of the agent or broker when evaluating risks for a professional association.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
11 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Individual members of a multiple-employer group or a professional association are typically required to obtain healthcare coverage through the group or association.
upvoted 0 times
Alonso
11 months ago
Yeah, that does make sense. It helps with ensuring everyone in the group has access to healthcare benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
11 months ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most accurate. It makes sense for members to get coverage through the group.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erinn
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C. Individual members of those groups are usually required to get coverage through the group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
11 months ago
I think the answer is A, because multiple-employer groups and professional associations may have members with higher health risks.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel