Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AHIP AHM-520 Exam - Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion

Posted by Daron on Jul 08, 2025 at 12:38 PM

If the total asset turnover ratio for the Fjord health plan is 1.08 and the total asset turnover ratio for the Grove health plan is 1.35, then a financial analyst could correctly infer that Fjord has used its assets more effectively than has Grove.

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium AHM-520 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
NE
Nenita 10 months ago
Just a fact check: higher ratio means better asset use.
MA
Maryann 11 months ago
Wait, how can Fjord be better with a lower ratio?
FA
Fanny 11 months ago
Fjord's ratio is lower, so they’re less effective.
GR
Graciela 11 months ago
Totally agree, Grove is doing better here!
MA
Marget 11 months ago
I thought it was the other way around, this is confusing!
SH
Shalon 11 months ago
From what I studied, a higher total asset turnover ratio suggests better efficiency, so I would lean towards B, False as well.
KA
Karma 12 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up the ratios. I thought a higher turnover ratio meant better performance, but I can't recall the exact details.
LA
Lai 12 months ago
I remember a practice question where a similar ratio was discussed, and it showed that a higher ratio generally means better asset utilization. So, I think the answer is B, False.
EL
Elise 1 year ago
I think the total asset turnover ratio indicates how efficiently a company uses its assets, but I'm not sure if a lower ratio always means less effectiveness.
DO
Dorcas 1 year ago
Okay, I've got it. The key is understanding that a higher total asset turnover ratio indicates less effective asset utilization. So since Fjord's ratio is lower, that means it has used its assets more effectively than Grove. Feeling confident about this now.
PA
Patrick 1 year ago
Wait, I'm confused. If Fjord's ratio is lower, doesn't that mean it's using its assets less effectively? This is tripping me up, I need to review the formula and examples from class.
SA
Samira 1 year ago
I think I get it now. Even though Fjord's ratio is lower, that actually means it's using its assets more effectively to generate revenue compared to Grove. The question is asking us to infer that based on the given information.
GE
Gennie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Wouldn't a higher total asset turnover ratio mean the company is using its assets more efficiently? I'll have to think this through carefully.
VA
Van 1 year ago
Okay, this looks straightforward. The total asset turnover ratio measures how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate revenue. Since Fjord's ratio is lower than Grove's, that means Fjord has used its assets more effectively.
RO
Rodrigo 1 year ago
I'm no financial wizard, but if Fjord's ratio is lower, doesn't that mean they're squeezing more out of their assets? I'm going with True, unless my magic 8-ball tells me otherwise.
AI
Aileen 1 year ago
I think it's True. Fjord's lower ratio means they are generating more revenue per dollar of assets.
SH
Shenika 1 year ago
False. Grove has a higher total asset turnover ratio.
LU
Lucia 1 year ago
Ah, the age-old debate of asset efficiency. If only we could turn our assets into gold, then we'd really be cooking with gas! Anyway, I'm siding with True on this one.
CO
Colene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lucia
I agree, Fjord seems to be using their assets more effectively.
VO
Von 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lucia
True
LI
Ligia 1 year ago
Hold up, isn't a higher asset turnover ratio a good thing? Shouldn't Grove be the one using its assets more effectively? I'm gonna have to go with False on this one.
MA
Malcolm 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ligia
False
SH
Shawnee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ligia
False
MU
Murray 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ligia
True
CO
Cortney 1 year ago
True. Fjord has used its assets more effectively.
VI
Virgina 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. If Fjord's asset turnover ratio is lower than Grove's, that means Fjord is using its assets more efficiently. I'm going with True on this one.
KE
Kenneth 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgina
That makes sense. Grove must not be utilizing their assets as efficiently as Fjord.
TA
Tawna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgina
I agree, Fjord's lower asset turnover ratio indicates they are using their assets more effectively.
LU
Lucia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Virgina
True
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel