MENU
Brighton Health Systems, Inc., a health plan, wants to modify its advertising and marketing materials to avoid liability risk under the principle of ostensible agency. One step that Brighton can take to reduce the likelihood of being liable for provider negligence under the theory of ostensible agency is to
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium AHM-510 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
KA
Kara
1 year ago
D clearly defines Brighton's role, good move!
LA
Lavonna
1 year ago
B could confuse members about who’s responsible.
LA
Laura
1 year ago
Surprised that A is even an option, that's risky!
GL
Glory
1 year ago
I disagree, D makes more sense for clarity.
VA
Van
1 year ago
C is the best option to avoid liability.
DE
Devora
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the implications of advertising materials. Would stating that Brighton provides healthcare really protect them from liability?
PE
Pearly
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on how to communicate the role of the health plan. I think option D makes the most sense for avoiding liability.
RI
Ricki
1 year ago
I remember discussing ostensible agency in class, and I think adding disclaimers could really help clarify that Brighton isn't making medical decisions.
JA
Jarod
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like guaranteeing the quality of care might actually increase liability risk instead of reducing it.
BU
Bulah
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. Since Node01 won't power on, we need to find a way to get the cluster back up and running using Node02. I think option C, the forced takeover, is the best choice here.
MA
Maurine
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I know Cygwin can provide a Linux-like environment on Windows, so option A could work. But I'm not sure if that's the best approach. I'll have to research this a bit more.