Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AHIP AHM-250 Exam - Topic 6 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-250 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 6
[All AHM-250 Questions]

The following statements describe violations of antitrust legislation:

Situation A - Two health plans in a single service area divided purchasers into two groups and agreed to each market their products to only one purchaser group.

Situation B - A spec

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Rochell at Aug 22, 2024, 09:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-250 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lang
4 months ago
I thought price fixing was more about setting prices, not dividing markets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about Situation B? Seems a bit unclear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
4 months ago
Totally agree with Lynette, that’s textbook antitrust violation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
4 months ago
I think Situation B is more about tying arrangements, not price fixing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
5 months ago
Situation A is definitely a horizontal division of markets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
5 months ago
I think Situation A is definitely about market division, but I'm torn between tying arrangement and price fixing for Situation B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
5 months ago
I thought a group boycott was more about refusing to deal with someone, not just dividing markets. I'm a bit confused about that part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where tying arrangements were involved, so I feel like that might be the right answer for Situation B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
5 months ago
I remember studying about horizontal divisions of markets, so I think Situation A fits that description. But I'm not sure about Situation B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Situation A is a horizontal division of markets, and Situation B is either a tying arrangement or price fixing. I'll weigh the options and select the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between horizontal division of markets and horizontal group boycott. I'll need to double-check my understanding of those concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward antitrust question. I'll carefully review the details of each situation and match them to the potential violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
6 months ago
The tying arrangement and price fixing options both seem plausible for Situation B. I'll need to think through the specifics of each to determine which one is the better match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
6 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go here. Manually assigning the products to the correct ancestor categories may take more work upfront, but it seems like the most straightforward and reliable solution in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
11 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. Both situations involve violations of antitrust legislation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
11 months ago
Hmm, this question is tricky. I'm leaning towards C, but I'm not 100% confident. Maybe I should ask the instructor for a hint - you know, just to 'fix' this problem, haha.
upvoted 0 times
Sheridan
11 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Let's go with C and see how it goes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
11 months ago
I think C is the right answer too. It makes sense with the situation described.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erinn
11 months ago
I believe Situation B is a tying arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
11 months ago
I think Situation A is a horizontal division of markets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
I think the answer is B. Situation A is a horizontal division of markets, and Situation B is price fixing. That's a classic antitrust violation combination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
11 months ago
Situation A definitely sounds like a horizontal division of markets, but I'm not sure about Situation B. I'll have to think that one through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
Ming
10 months ago
That makes sense, it could be a way to limit competition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
10 months ago
Situation B might be a tying arrangement, where they force customers to buy one product in order to get another.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
11 months ago
I agree, it seems like they are dividing up the purchasers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
11 months ago
I think Situation A is definitely a horizontal division of markets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel