AHIP AHM-250 Exam - Topic 6 Question 118 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-250 exam

Question #: 118
Topic #: 6

In certain situations, a health plan can use the results of utilization review to intervene, if necessary, to alter the course of a plan member's medical care. Such intervention can be based on the results of

AProspective review

BConcurrent review

CAB

DA, B, and C

EA and B only

FA and C only

GB only

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Frederic at Nov 02, 2025, 02:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-250 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Nidia

4 months ago

I’m not sure, but B only feels too limited. Maybe D is safer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

4 months ago

I lean towards D too. All reviews are important for intervention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

4 months ago

I feel like A and B are the most relevant. So, E seems right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

4 months ago

Not sure if I trust them to intervene like that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carri

5 months ago

Totally agree, it's all about A, B, and C!

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

5 months ago

Wait, can they really change your treatment like that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

5 months ago

I think it's just A and B, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shakira

5 months ago

D. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

5 months ago

D is the way to go. Gotta love that comprehensive answer!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

5 months ago

Definitely D. Utilization review can be used for prospective, concurrent, and retrospective interventions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micah

6 months ago

I’m a bit confused about whether retrospective review plays a role here. I thought it was only A and B that mattered for intervention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jill

6 months ago

I feel like concurrent review is definitely important for ongoing care, but I can't recall if both A and B are necessary for intervention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chuck

6 months ago

D. A, B, and C are all correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

6 months ago

I think the answer is D. A, B, and C cover all bases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elza

6 months ago

Definitely A, B, and C!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

7 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about using both prospective and concurrent reviews for effective intervention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karina

7 months ago

I'm going with D. Covers all the bases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ora

7 months ago

I think I remember that prospective review is about assessing care before it happens, but I'm not sure if that alone is enough for intervention.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

7 months ago

Hmm, I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding. Let me quickly review the key differences between prospective, concurrent, and retrospective review to make sure I'm on the right track.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

7 months ago

This is a good opportunity to showcase my knowledge of utilization review. I'll methodically go through each answer choice and evaluate how the different types of review could be used to intervene in a member's care.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michal

8 months ago

I'm a little confused by the wording here. What exactly do they mean by "intervene" in the member's care? I'll need to make sure I understand that before I can determine which type(s) of review would be appropriate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erin

8 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about the specific types of utilization review that can be used to intervene in a member's care. I'll need to carefully consider the differences between prospective, concurrent, and retrospective review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaquana

8 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different types of utilization review and how they might be used to intervene in a member's care.

upvoted 0 times