Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AGA Exam CGFM Topic 2 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for AGA's CGFM exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 2
[All CGFM Questions]

A state agency has begun a pilot program with a community action agency for a community-based approach to provide services to underserved areas. A review after the first year compared the number of families served by both agencies and identified efficiencies reached by having community involvement. What type of engagement was used to review the pilot program?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Sang at Apr 29, 2024, 06:08 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CGFM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lashon
3 months ago
I'm with Alida on this one. Performance audit all the way! Although, I do wonder if they considered strapping the families to a treadmill to measure their 'community involvement.' Just a thought.
upvoted 0 times
Nu
2 months ago
Haha, strapping families to a treadmill might be a bit extreme for measuring community involvement!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
2 months ago
I agree, a performance audit would be the most appropriate for this type of review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
2 months ago
I think a performance audit was used to review the pilot program.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
3 months ago
A performance audit, huh? Well, I guess that makes sense. Though I'm still wondering if they could have used a magic 8-ball to review the program. Just kidding, of course. Performance audit it is.
upvoted 0 times
Vinnie
2 months ago
Haha, a magic 8-ball would have been interesting, but I think a performance audit was the more practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
3 months ago
Yeah, a performance audit was definitely the way to go for reviewing the pilot program.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alida
3 months ago
Hold on, I've got this! It's definitely a performance audit. The question is all about evaluating the program's performance and community involvement, not just the finances. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. A financial audit or a single audit could also be used to review the pilot program, right? I'm a bit stumped on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think a financial audit could also be used to review the pilot program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
3 months ago
I think the correct answer here is C) performance audit. The question mentions reviewing the program's efficiency and effectiveness, which is the focus of a performance audit.
upvoted 0 times
Sina
2 months ago
Attestation is more about verifying information, so it's not the best fit for reviewing the pilot program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
2 months ago
A single audit is typically for organizations that receive federal funding, so it wouldn't apply here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
2 months ago
I think a financial audit wouldn't be as relevant in this case since it focuses more on financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
3 months ago
I agree, a performance audit makes sense for reviewing the efficiency of the pilot program.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trevor
3 months ago
I agree with Otis, a performance audit makes sense to review the pilot program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
4 months ago
I think the type of engagement used was a performance audit.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel