Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E906 Exam - Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion

An AEM server is overloaded with too many concurrently running workflows. The developer decides to reduce the number of concurrent workflows. What should be configured?
A) Maximum Parallel jobs in OSGI console
B) Launchers for each workflow
C) The number of threads in scheduler

Adobe AD0-E906 Exam - Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E906 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E906 Questions]

An AEM server is overloaded with too many concurrently running workflows. The developer decides to reduce the number of concurrent workflows. What should be configured?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In AEM, to limit the number of concurrent workflows running at the same time, you need to adjust the Maximum Parallel Jobs setting in the OSGI console. This setting controls how many workflow jobs can be processed simultaneously, and reducing this number will lower the load on the server by limiting the number of workflows that can run concurrently.

This setting can be found under the Day CQ Workflow - Workflow Engine configuration in the OSGI Web Console.

Options B and C refer to specific workflows and threads, but they do not directly address the overall system limit on concurrent workflow executions.

Refer to the AEM documentation on workflow scaling and performance for more information on how to adjust these settings in the OSGI configuration.


by Stefany at Jun 20, 2026, 02:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E906 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Bev
4 days ago
But B could help too, managing workflows better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
9 days ago
I agree, A makes sense. Less overload is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
14 days ago
I think A is the best choice. It directly limits the workflows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
20 days ago
Wait, can you really just change that in the OSGI console? Sounds too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
25 days ago
Totally agree with A! Makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
30 days ago
C) The number of threads in scheduler? Not sure that’s the right fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
1 month ago
I think B) Launchers for each workflow could help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
1 month ago
A) Maximum Parallel jobs in OSGI console is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
2 months ago
I thought reducing concurrent workflows was mainly about adjusting the maximum parallel jobs. But what if there are other factors involved?
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
2 months ago
I feel like the number of threads in the scheduler might also play a role, but I can't recall the specifics. We might have seen a question like this before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about launchers being important for workflows. Could that be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
2 months ago
I think we talked about configuring the maximum parallel jobs in the OSGI console during our last study session. That seems like the right option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel