New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E902 Exam - Topic 2 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E902 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E902 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

In a scenario, there are two aggregators displaying different numbers in the bundle inspector: Aggregator 1 displays a 1, and Aggregator 2 displays a 10. What is a possible reason for this difference?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Understanding the Scenario:

The diagram shows two routes, each leading to an aggregator module (Aggregator 1 and Aggregator 2).

The bundle inspector indicates different output counts for the two aggregators: Aggregator 1 displays 1, and Aggregator 2 displays 10.

Option Analysis:

A . Aggregator 1's route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2's route is set to process all bundles:

Incorrect. Aggregators process data from their input modules based on their configuration. While filters or limits might be applied earlier in the flow, the scenario does not suggest that the aggregator's configuration explicitly limits bundles in this way.

B . The source module for the aggregators are different:

Correct. The two aggregators receive input from different modules. For example, Aggregator 1 might aggregate bundles from 'Projects,' which outputs a single bundle, while Aggregator 2 aggregates bundles from 'Issues,' which outputs 10 bundles. This explains the differing numbers in the bundle inspector.

C . Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times:

Incorrect. Aggregators do not 'repeat' a specific number of times. Instead, they process the input bundles passed to them and output a result based on the aggregation logic.

D . The scenario's router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2:

Incorrect. While the router might direct specific bundles (e.g., 'Projects' to Aggregator 1 and 'Issues' to Aggregator 2), the difference in bundle counts is determined by the source modules, not by the router's configuration alone.

Why Source Modules Determine Bundle Counts:

Each aggregator processes data from a source module. If the source module outputs different numbers of bundles, the aggregators will show different bundle counts.

In this example, 'Projects' might output only 1 bundle (e.g., 1 project), while 'Issues' outputs 10 bundles (e.g., 10 issues).

How to Verify:

Inspect the source modules feeding into each aggregator. Check the number of bundles they produce during the scenario run.

Confirm that the aggregators are aggregating based on their respective inputs.

Reference: This explanation aligns with Workfront Fusion's handling of bundles and aggregation logic. Differences in bundle counts at the aggregator level are typically due to differences in the source module outputs, as shown in the scenario.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Joni
3 months ago
Nah, I’m leaning towards the router settings being the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
3 months ago
I think it's the source modules being different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
3 months ago
Wait, how can one aggregator show 10? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
4 months ago
Totally makes sense, different routes can lead to that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
4 months ago
Aggregator 1 processes just the 1st bundle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
4 months ago
D sounds like it could be right, but I’m a bit confused about how the router settings work in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the repeat setting affected the output, so C seems plausible too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
4 months ago
I’m not sure, but I think B could be a possibility since different sources might lead to different counts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
5 months ago
I remember something about routes affecting how many bundles each aggregator processes, so maybe A is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
5 months ago
I think I've got it! Option A seems like the most plausible explanation based on the details in the question. The different settings for the aggregators' routes would explain the discrepancy in the displayed numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The options seem to cover a range of potential reasons, but I'm not sure which one is the most likely explanation. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
5 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy for this. I'll first consider the possible reasons for the difference, then eliminate the options that don't make sense based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key seems to be understanding the difference between the two aggregators. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'll double-check the other choices just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the different ways the aggregators could be configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
12 months ago
Hey, maybe Aggregator 2 is just feeling a little too repetitive today, you know? That's why it's displaying a 10 - it's like, 'I'm done with this, let's move on!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
12 months ago
I have a feeling the router is the culprit here. Option D sounds like it could be the reason for the difference in the displayed numbers. Gotta love those tricky scenario-based questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
12 months ago
This is a tricky one. I wonder if the source module setting could be the issue, as mentioned in option B. Maybe the data is coming from different sources for the two aggregators.
upvoted 0 times
Sang
11 months ago
Aggregator 2 might be getting data from a different source module, causing it to display a 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
11 months ago
I think option B makes sense. The source module could be the reason for the different numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dino
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I'm leaning towards option A. It seems like the route settings for the aggregators are different, leading to the discrepancy in the displayed numbers.
upvoted 0 times
Elden
12 months ago
User 2: Agreed, it seems like the most logical explanation for the discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
12 months ago
User 1: I think option A makes sense. The route settings could be the reason for the different numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leah
1 year ago
But wouldn't it make more sense for it to be B)?
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option C is the correct answer. Aggregator 2 is set to repeat 10 times, so it's displaying the total count of bundles processed.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
12 months ago
Let's go with option C then, it seems to be the most likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
12 months ago
That's possible, but I still think option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
12 months ago
But what if Aggregator 2 is just processing bundles differently?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
12 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical explanation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's C)
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
1 year ago
I think the answer is A)
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel