New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E720 Exam - Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E720 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E720 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer was asked to customize a JavaScript component which is written as a function. How would the developer extend the native JavaScript function?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To customize a JavaScript component that is written as a function, the developer can use option A. This option will use the prototype property of the function to extend its functionality and add new methods or properties. For example:

function Component() { // Component logic }

Component.prototype.customMethod = function() { // Custom method logic };

This will create a new method called customMethod on the prototype of the Component function, which can be accessed by any instance of the Component object. The developer can also override existing methods or properties on the prototype by reassigning them with new values.

Option B is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new function that wraps the original function. This will not allow the developer to access or modify the properties or methods of the original function. Option C is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new object that inherits from the original function. This will not allow the developer to customize the original function itself, but only its instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Arlette
3 months ago
Extending native functions can lead to unexpected behavior, be careful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
3 months ago
Definitely not Option C, that doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
3 months ago
Wait, can you really modify native functions like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
4 months ago
I think Option B is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
4 months ago
You can extend functions using prototypes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
4 months ago
I remember something about using `Function.prototype` to extend functions. I hope that’s relevant here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the options. I feel like one of them might be about overriding the function, but I can’t recall the exact syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
4 months ago
I think we did a similar practice question where we had to modify a native function. I feel like it involved using the `call` or `apply` methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
5 months ago
I remember we discussed extending functions in JavaScript, but I’m not sure if it’s about using prototypes or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
5 months ago
I'm a bit torn between Options A and C. I'll need to double-check the details, but I think C might be the better choice for extending the function in a maintainable way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
5 months ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. Option B seems like the most straightforward way to extend the native function and add custom functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to refresh my knowledge on how to properly extend JavaScript functions before I can decide on the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the best approach to extending the native JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Based on my understanding, Option C is the way to go here. Extending the function using the prototype is the cleanest and most flexible approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. First, I need to install the Azure ML SDK. Then, I'll connect to the workspace and run the training script as an experiment on the local compute. Shouldn't be too difficult.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'll review the information provided and think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
5 months ago
Okay, creating separate business units sounds like a solid strategy. I think this will give me the customization I need for the financial reporting across the different legal entities. I'll mark this as my answer for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
5 months ago
This looks straightforward. I think option C is the way to go - just log into the GUI and change the NTP server setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
5 months ago
I'm torn between $50,000 and $70,000. I just hope I don't confuse guaranteed payments with something else on the exam!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 years ago
I think most developers would agree that Option A is the most efficient choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
2 years ago
I see your point. Option A does seem more straightforward for customizing the JavaScript component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 years ago
Option A provides a clear and concise way to extend the function, that's why I prefer it over the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
2 years ago
But what about Option B or C? They also seem like potential solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
2 years ago
I agree, Option A seems like the best choice for extending the native JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 years ago
I think the developer should go with Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
2 years ago
I think Option B is the way to go because it provides a clear and structured approach to customizing the function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe Option C would be the better choice for extending the function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
2 years ago
I think the developer can extend the native JavaScript function by using Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel