New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E720 Exam - Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E720 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E720 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer wants to add a custom widget that extends the default Calendar Widget. What would the contents of this file look like?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To add a custom widget that extends the default Calendar Widget, the contents of the file would look like option B. This is because option B follows the correct syntax and structure for defining a jQuery widget in Magento. The code does the following steps:

Defines a module with the name ''Vendor_Module/js/calendar-widget'' that depends on the ''jquery/ui'' and ''Magento_Ui/js/lib/knockout/bindings/datepicker'' modules.

Returns a function that creates a new widget with the name ''vendor.calendarWidget'' that extends the base calendar widget class.

Overrides the init function of the base calendar widget class to add custom logic or functionality to the widget.

Option A is not correct because it does not use the correct syntax for defining a jQuery widget. It uses a script tag instead of a define function, which is not valid for creating a module. It also uses an incorrect name for the widget, which should use a dot instead of a slash. Option C is not correct because it does not use the correct syntax for extending a widget. It uses an extend function instead of a widget function, which is not valid for creating a new widget. It also does not return anything from the module, which will cause an error. Reference: [jQuery widgets], [Calendar Widget]


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Naomi
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure this is how it should be done? Looks complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
3 months ago
I agree, Option A is definitely the best choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
4 months ago
Not sure about Option C, it seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
4 months ago
I think Option B looks more complete though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
4 months ago
Option A has the right structure for a custom widget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
4 months ago
I feel like I saw something like this in our last session. I want to say Option A is the one, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
4 months ago
I'm not sure if I should choose A or C. They both seem to have the right structure, but I can't remember the specific properties needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
4 months ago
I think Option B looks familiar; it might be similar to a practice question we did on custom widgets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
5 months ago
I remember we practiced extending widgets, but I can't quite recall the exact syntax for the Calendar Widget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
5 months ago
This is a good test of my Magento development skills. I'll need to dig into the Calendar Widget code, understand the architecture, and then thoughtfully extend it to meet the custom needs. Might take some trial and error, but I'm confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a plan for this. First, I'll identify the key differences between the default Calendar Widget and the custom requirements. Then I'll work on overriding the necessary methods and adding the new functionality. Gotta be careful not to break the core functionality though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I'd start by carefully reviewing the default Calendar Widget code to understand the structure and functionality. Then I'd focus on how to extend that to add the custom features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Extending a core widget seems tricky - I'll need to research the best practices for that. Probably start by looking at the Magento documentation on widget customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
5 months ago
I think either the WLST command or the 'kill -9' option would work, but the 'kill -9' approach is probably the most robust test. It's important to make sure we run it twice, just in case the server tries to restart itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
5 months ago
I feel like no access is needed for just previewing, but that doesn't sound right considering the context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
5 months ago
I'm confused between A and D. Is imaging really about completely preserving data without any changes? Need to think carefully about this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. The wording of the options is a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully review each one to make sure I understand the nuances before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel