Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe AD0-E717 Exam - Topic 9 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E717 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 9
[All AD0-E717 Questions]

Which action, if any, should be taken to forbid Adobe Commerce Admin from performing specific actions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

On an Adobe Commerce Cloud Enhanced Integration Environment, enabling Fastly CDN (Content Delivery Network) can significantly improve performance by caching content closer to the user's location, reducing load times. Additionally, removing all of the integration's inactive branches helps to optimize the environment by decluttering and focusing resources on active development. Restricting catalog size may not be feasible or desirable, and disabling cron jobs can disrupt necessary background operations unless specifically needed for performance testing or troubleshooting.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Matt
4 months ago
I agree with A, custom roles are super useful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
5 months ago
Wait, can we really restrict admin actions? That seems surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
5 months ago
C sounds like a solid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
5 months ago
I think B is wrong, there are ways to limit access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
5 months ago
A is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
6 months ago
I vaguely recall that enabling custom roles is a feature in Adobe Commerce, so option C could be the answer, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
6 months ago
I thought all admin users had to have full access, so option B seems plausible, but I feel like there might be exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like there was a practice question about restricting admin access, and it mentioned something about enabling custom roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
6 months ago
I remember discussing how creating custom user roles can limit what actions admins can perform. I think option A sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
6 months ago
Ah, option C looks promising. Enabling custom roles and assigning the admin user ID could be the way to go. I'll make sure to read the question closely and consider all the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
6 months ago
Option B can't be right - I know admins need to have some level of access, but there must be a way to limit specific actions. I'll think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to double-check the documentation on admin roles and permissions to make sure I understand the options fully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
6 months ago
This seems straightforward - I'd go with option A and create a custom user role to restrict the admin's access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
6 months ago
This question looks straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
7 months ago
Gag clauses do stick out to me, but I can't exactly remember if they're common in provider contracts or just a specific case we discussed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
11 months ago
Option C is just asking for trouble. Enabling custom roles is the way to go, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
11 months ago
Haha, full admin access? Might as well just give them the keys to the kingdom. Where's the fun in that?
upvoted 0 times
Hershel
10 months ago
C) Enable custom roles in the store configuration, and assign admin user ID(s).
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
11 months ago
B) Haha, full admin access? Might as well just give them the keys to the kingdom. Where's the fun in that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
11 months ago
A) Create a new user role with custom-defined resources, and assign it to the admin user
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anika
11 months ago
I agree with Mendy. Creating a custom role is the way to go. Gotta keep that admin access under control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
12 months ago
Wait, all admin users must have full access? That's a bit concerning. Shouldn't we be able to limit their capabilities?
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
10 months ago
B) This action cannot be taken since all admin users must have full access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
10 months ago
That does seem concerning. Maybe we should look into creating custom roles for admins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
11 months ago
C) Enable custom roles in the store configuration, and assign admin user ID(s).
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
11 months ago
A) Create a new user role with custom-defined resources, and assign it to the admin user
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raul
12 months ago
I agree with Dell. Option A provides more control and security for the admin user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
12 months ago
Option A seems like the logical choice here. Restricting admin access is an important security measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the way to go. Admin users should have full access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
12 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It allows for custom-defined resources to restrict access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
12 months ago
I agree with Cletus. Option A provides more control and security for the admin user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the way to go. Admin users should have full access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice. It allows for custom-defined resources to restrict access.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel