Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe Exam AD0-E704 Topic 8 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E704 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 8
[All AD0-E704 Questions]

A Magento site is experiencing an issue where a fatal out of memory error occurs during a custom bulk catalog import process. Here is the code:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cecilia at Jan 25, 2024, 12:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E704 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Franchesca
3 months ago
I'd have to go with option B. Injecting an instance of IteratingCollectionFactory seems like the most elegant solution to me. It's like using a telescope to see the stars instead of just staring at the sky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
3 months ago
C is the way to go. Iterating through the collection row-by-row is the most efficient way to handle this without running out of memory. It's like trying to eat an elephant one bite at a time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
3 months ago
Ha! Memory issues during a bulk catalog import? That's like trying to fill up a bottomless pit. I'd go with option A and just increase the memory limit. Problem solved!
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
1 months ago
User 3: Definitely, that should fix the issue with the out of memory error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
2 months ago
User 1: Yeah, increasing the memory limit seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorthy
3 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. Both seem like viable options, but I might go with D since it allows me to process the collection in chunks.
upvoted 0 times
Loren
2 months ago
User 3: D seems like the safer option to prevent memory errors during the bulk import process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It's better to avoid memory issues by iterating through the collection in chunks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
3 months ago
User 1: I think D is the way to go, processing in chunks sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeannine
3 months ago
Option C looks like the best approach to me. Using an iterator to walk through the collection row-by-row should help manage the memory usage effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Tyra
2 months ago
Yeah, option C is the best choice for managing memory usage during the bulk import process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
I think using an iterator is definitely the way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient way to handle the memory issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jimmie
4 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A would be more straightforward to implement in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient as it allows for iterating through the collection in chunks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
4 months ago
I think option A is the best solution because it directly addresses the memory limit issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
4 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A would be more straightforward to implement in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient as it allows for iterating through the collection in chunks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
4 months ago
I think option A is the best solution because it directly addresses the memory limit issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel