Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E704 Exam - Topic 10 Question 48 Discussion

When your class will be instantiated all the dependencies injected in your class constructor will also get instantiated, and it will trigger a chain reaction of object creation, this can really slow down the process. What could be the solution of above problem?
C) Use Dependecy Injection with help of di.xml
A) Use Proxy classes with help of di.xml
B) Use VitualType classes with help of di.xml
D) Use factory classes instead of Model.

Adobe AD0-E704 Exam - Topic 10 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E704 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 10
[All AD0-E704 Questions]

When your class will be instantiated all the dependencies injected in your class constructor will also get instantiated, and it will trigger a chain reaction of object creation, this can really slow down the process. What could be the solution of above problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Reid at Sep 16, 2024, 02:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E704 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kristal
8 months ago
VirtualType classes might be a good option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
8 months ago
Wait, so all dependencies get instantiated at once? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
8 months ago
Not sure about that, isn't DI supposed to simplify things?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
9 months ago
I think using factory classes is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
9 months ago
Proxy classes can really help with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
9 months ago
I recall that using Dependency Injection is crucial, but I wonder if just relying on it without any optimization would still lead to performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between VirtualType and Proxy classes. I feel like I might have mixed them up during our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
10 months ago
I think we talked about Proxy classes in our last session, and they seemed like a good way to handle dependencies without instantiating everything at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
I remember discussing how using factory classes can help manage object creation more efficiently, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on using the di.xml file to configure the dependency injection and see if that helps avoid the chain reaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
10 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the dependencies and how to manage the object creation process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident I can solve this one. The key is to use the right approach to manage the dependencies and avoid the performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
1 year ago
Dependency Injection with di.xml? That's a pretty solid solution. It's like using a slingshot to take down a herd of elephants - simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
1 year ago
VitualType classes with di.xml? Sounds like someone's been watching too many sci-fi movies! But hey, if it works, it works.
upvoted 0 times
Stefania
1 year ago
D) Use factory classes instead of Model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 year ago
C) Use Dependecy Injection with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
1 year ago
B) Use VitualType classes with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
1 year ago
A) Use Proxy classes with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenna
1 year ago
Factory classes instead of Model? Hmm, I'm not sure if that's the correct approach here. I feel like Dependency Injection is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Tamra
1 year ago
C) Use Dependecy Injection with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 year ago
B) Use VitualType classes with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 year ago
A) Use Proxy classes with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joesph
1 year ago
Proxy classes with di.xml? That's an interesting idea, but I'm not sure if that's the best solution for this problem.
upvoted 0 times
Billye
1 year ago
C) Use Dependecy Injection with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
1 year ago
B) Use VitualType classes with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
1 year ago
A) Use Proxy classes with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eulah
1 year ago
I think the solution is to use Dependency Injection with the help of di.xml. This way, we can manage the instantiation of dependencies more effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
1 year ago
C) Use Dependecy Injection with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
1 year ago
B) Use VitualType classes with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 year ago
A) Use Proxy classes with help of di.xml
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawn
1 year ago
I personally prefer using Dependency Injection with help of di.xml, as it provides a cleaner and more organized way of managing dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 year ago
I agree with Carman, using Proxy classes can help in avoiding the slow down caused by object creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
1 year ago
I think the solution could be using Proxy classes with help of di.xml.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel