Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E307 Exam - Topic 5 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E307 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 5
[All AD0-E307 Questions]

In a Query where the targeting dimension is Recipients, the Practitioner changes the filtering dimension to

Transactions and specifies filtering transaction amount. The preview provides a count of 116,361 records.

When the Practitioner executes the Query, the record count is 8,643 records.

What is the likely reason?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Willard at Sep 13, 2024, 06:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E307 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gianna
4 months ago
Not sure about that, could be duplicates in the Recipient table too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
5 months ago
Definitely looks like the preview considers all Recipients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
5 months ago
Wait, how can the count drop so much? That’s surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
5 months ago
I think the preview is just an estimate, not the real deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
5 months ago
Seems like there are multiple purchases per Recipient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
6 months ago
I wonder if duplicates in the Recipient table could be affecting the count. That might make option D plausible too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the preview might not account for the filtering properly. Could it be option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
6 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where multiple transactions per recipient caused confusion. Could it be option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
6 months ago
I remember something about how previews can sometimes show inflated numbers, so maybe option B is right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got an idea. The key here is that the targeting dimension is Recipients, but the filtering dimension is Transactions. That means the preview is likely looking at all Recipients, while the actual query is filtering down to specific Transactions. So the difference in counts could be due to multiple Transactions per Recipient. I'll need to double-check that, but that's my initial thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
6 months ago
Alright, let's think this through. The fact that the preview count is so much higher than the actual count suggests that there might be some kind of filtering or aggregation happening that's not being properly accounted for. I'll need to carefully examine the query and the data to figure out what's going on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The preview count is so much higher than the actual count, but I'm not sure why that would be. Maybe there are some hidden filters or aggregations happening that I'm not seeing. I'll need to really dive into the details to understand what's going on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
6 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can figure this out. The key seems to be the difference between the preview and the actual count. Maybe the preview is just an estimate, or maybe there are some duplicates or other issues with the data. I'll need to analyze this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
6 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. The preview count and the actual count are quite different, so there must be something going on with the data or the query. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
11 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if the Practitioner forgot to check their crystal ball before running the query. Gotta love those unpredictable preview estimates!
upvoted 0 times
Silva
11 months ago
C) The preview looks at all Recipients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
11 months ago
B) The preview gives an estimate, not an accurate count.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
A) There are multiple purchases per Recipient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arletta
12 months ago
The preview looking at all Recipients, eh? That's a classic case of a false positive. Option C is the way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
12 months ago
Hold up, are we sure there aren't just some sneaky duplicates in the Recipient table? Option D could be the culprit. Time to do some data cleaning, I suppose.
upvoted 0 times
Eliseo
10 months ago
User 4: Time to clean up the data and remove any duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
11 months ago
User 3: It's possible that the preview count didn't account for duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
User 2: Maybe there are duplicates in the Recipient table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
11 months ago
User 1: Option D could be the reason for the discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rocco
12 months ago
Ah, I see. The Practitioner changed the filtering dimension to Transactions, so the final count is likely lower due to multiple purchases per Recipient. Option A seems like the most plausible explanation here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
But could it also be that the preview gives an estimate, not an accurate count?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 year ago
The preview showing a higher count than the actual results is definitely strange. I'm guessing it's option B - the preview gives an estimate, not an accurate count.
upvoted 0 times
Jolanda
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that could be it. It's not always accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
11 months ago
The preview might be looking at all Recipients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
11 months ago
Could be that there are multiple purchases per Recipient.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
11 months ago
User 1: Maybe the preview is just an estimate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
11 months ago
Maybe there are duplicates in the Recipient table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
11 months ago
I think the preview is just an estimate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
1 year ago
I agree with Alverta, it makes sense that the record count would be lower if there are duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
1 year ago
I think the reason is there are duplicates in the Recipient table.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel