I don't know, man, waiting 24 hours? That's a whole day of productivity lost! This ain't no geology experiment, we need that workflow moving pronto. Gotta be option B, no doubt.
Hmm, B seems a bit too simplistic, don't you think? I'm gonna go with D - the scheduler keeps on schedule but avoids the problematic activity. Seems like the most well-rounded approach to me.
I'm feeling option A, the scheduler just keeps on keeping on. Ain't nobody got time to restart the whole thing every time there's a hiccup. Gotta keep that workflow flowing, baby!
Ooh, D sounds like the winner to me. The scheduler keeps on truckin' and just skips the error activity. Efficient and practical, just the way I like it.
The scheduler definitely doesn't wait 24 hours, that's like watching paint dry. I'm gonna go with option B - no run until it's restarted. Gotta keep that workflow moving, you know?
Alease
28 days agoMelvin
29 days agoAudry
3 days agoGerry
8 days agoPhil
1 months agoLucille
1 months agoKatie
10 days agoDino
21 days agoCyril
24 days agoVerdell
2 months agoVince
2 months agoVerdell
2 months agoGabriele
2 months agoBuck
2 months agoBlythe
2 months agoFausto
25 days agoMike
26 days agoJoesph
29 days agoMalcolm
1 months agoMadalyn
2 months ago