Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E137 Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

A developer is creating a dialog for a component, which has a checkbox field. After saving the component configuration, the developer noticed that the checkbox value is stored as a String type in JCR.What should be done to store the checkbox value as a Boolean type in JCR?
B) Add TypeHint field to the dialog
A) Implement JCR Event Listener to change field type afterwards
C) Use Switch instead of Checkbox

Adobe AD0-E137 Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E137 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E137 Questions]

A developer is creating a dialog for a component, which has a checkbox field. After saving the component configuration, the developer noticed that the checkbox value is stored as a String type in JCR.

What should be done to store the checkbox value as a Boolean type in JCR?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Leonora at Oct 30, 2025, 03:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E137 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Regenia
5 months ago
I feel like option B is straightforward. Less complexity is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
6 months ago
Option C seems too drastic. A checkbox is fine, just fix the type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
6 months ago
I disagree. A JCR Event Listener (option A) could handle it dynamically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
6 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. TypeHint can guide the storage type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
6 months ago
Definitely not a fan of the Event Listener option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
6 months ago
Haha, using a Switch instead of a Checkbox? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
6 months ago
I'd go with B as well. Seems like the most straightforward solution to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
7 months ago
Definitely B. Storing the checkbox value as a String is just asking for trouble down the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
7 months ago
B) Add TypeHint field to the dialog is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards the TypeHint option, but I’m not completely confident. It might be worth double-checking the documentation on data types in JCR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
7 months ago
Implementing a JCR Event Listener sounds like it could work, but it seems a bit complicated for just changing a field type after saving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
7 months ago
Adding a TypeHint field seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
7 months ago
I think using a Switch is a good idea!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
8 months ago
Just change the field type in the dialog settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
8 months ago
B is the way to go. Gotta love those TypeHint fields, they make life so much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
8 months ago
Wait, why would it store as a String in the first place?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
8 months ago
I feel like I saw a similar question where we had to convert types in JCR. I think using a Switch might not be the best solution since it’s still a UI element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
8 months ago
I think I remember something about using a TypeHint to specify the data type in dialogs, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
9 months ago
I think I'd start by trying option B. Adding the TypeHint field seems like the most direct way to control the data type being stored in JCR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
9 months ago
Option C to use a Switch instead of a Checkbox is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure if that fully addresses the requirement to store the value as a Boolean type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if the JCR Event Listener approach in option A would be the best solution. Seems a bit complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
9 months ago
I think I'd start by looking at option B - adding a TypeHint field to the dialog. That seems like the most straightforward way to specify the field type.
upvoted 0 times
Nu
4 months ago
Yeah, let's stick with B for clarity and simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
4 months ago
Option C seems like a workaround. I prefer a direct approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
4 months ago
But what about option A? Wouldn't an event listener work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
5 months ago
Adding a TypeHint could really clarify the data type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
5 months ago
I agree, option B sounds like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel