New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E134 Exam - Topic 8 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E134 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 8
[All AD0-E134 Questions]

Which practice should be used to push a code fix to make it into the current release candidate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

To push a code fix into the current release candidate, the best practice is to cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate branch. Cherry-picking allows you to apply specific changes from one branch to another, ensuring that only the necessary fixes are included without introducing unrelated changes.

Here's how to cherry-pick a commit:

Identify the Commit: Locate the commit hash of the fix you need to apply. This can be found in your version control system (e.g., Git).

Checkout the Release Candidate Branch:

git checkout release-candidate-branch

Cherry-pick the Commit:

git cherry-pick <commit-hash>

Resolve Conflicts (if any): If there are conflicts, resolve them manually and then continue the cherry-pick process:

git add <resolved-files>

git cherry-pick --continue

Test the Changes: Ensure that the changes are tested thoroughly in the release candidate environment to confirm the fix works as expected.

Push the Changes:

git push origin release-candidate-branch

Cherry-picking ensures that only the required changes are applied to the release candidate, maintaining the stability and integrity of the codebase.


Git Cherry-pick Documentation

by Deandrea at Dec 10, 2024, 05:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E134 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Colette
3 months ago
I agree with D, it's quick and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
3 months ago
Wait, can you really just upload a package directly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
3 months ago
B seems like overkill for a small fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
4 months ago
Definitely not A, that could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
4 months ago
I think cherry-picking is the safest way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
4 months ago
I recall we discussed uploading packages locally, which I think is option C. But I'm not confident if that's the best practice for pushing fixes to a release candidate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
4 months ago
I might be mixing things up, but I feel like creating a new release candidate from the master branch (option B) is a safer approach. It keeps the history clean, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about making fixes directly in CRX. Is that option A? It feels risky to change the deployed version directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
5 months ago
I think option D sounds familiar, like something we practiced in our last session about version control. Cherry-picking seems like a good way to apply specific fixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
5 months ago
I've got this! The answer is to make the fix locally and upload the package to where the release candidate is deployed. That way, we can get the fix out there without having to go through the whole release process again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I believe the correct answer is to cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate. That way, we can get the fix in without having to create a whole new release candidate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I was thinking we should just make the fix directly in the CRX where the current release candidate is deployed. Wouldn't that be the quickest way to get the fix out there?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one, but I think the best approach would be to create a new release candidate from the master branch. That way, we can ensure the fix is included in the latest version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
1 year ago
Hah, who needs to fix bugs when you can just ship the broken code and blame the users? That's the real secret to software development!
upvoted 0 times
Queen
1 year ago
B) Create a new release candidate from the master branch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
1 year ago
D) Cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
1 year ago
A) Make the fix in CRX where the current release candidate is currently deployed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brendan
1 year ago
D) Cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate. Yep, that's the one. Nice and clean, no need to mess around with new release candidates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
1 year ago
C) Make the fix locally and upload the package to where the release candidate is deployed. Hmm, I don't know, seems a bit sketchy to me.
upvoted 0 times
Patrick
1 year ago
D) Cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
1 year ago
C) Make the fix locally and upload the package to where the release candidate is deployed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
1 year ago
B) Create a new release candidate from the master branch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 year ago
A) Make the fix in CRX where the current release candidate is currently deployed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ernie
1 year ago
B) Create a new release candidate from the master branch. Seems like the safest and most reliable option to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
1 year ago
I think making the fix locally and uploading the package is the safest option, to avoid any conflicts with the current deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
1 year ago
I prefer to cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate, it's quicker and more targeted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
1 year ago
D) Cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate. That's the way to go, gotta get that fix into the current release without delay!
upvoted 0 times
Remona
1 year ago
User4: No, cherry-picking the fix commit is the most efficient option in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
1 year ago
User3: Should we consider creating a new release candidate from the master branch instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
1 year ago
User2: Agreed, that's the quickest way to get the fix into the current release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
1 year ago
User1: I think we should cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
1 year ago
User 4: Let's get it done quickly then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, we need to make sure the release is stable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, it's the quickest way to get the fix in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
1 year ago
User 1: Cherry-pick the fix commit into the release candidate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
1 year ago
I agree with Paz, creating a new release candidate would ensure the fix is properly integrated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
1 year ago
I think we should create a new release candidate from the master branch.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel