Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe Exam AD0-E134 Topic 4 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E134 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E134 Questions]

A developer needs to create an OSGI service that is able to read a list of spoken languages from the configuration of the service. The configuration file tanguageServicelmplefgjson' already exisls:

Which snippet should the developer use lo read the OSGi configurations?

A)

B)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The aemanalyser-maven-plugin is a Maven plugin that checks if all the requirements declarations made in OSGi bundles are satisfied by the capabilities declarations of other bundles included in the Maven project. This plugin ensures that the OSGi bundles are consistent and can be resolved at runtime. The plugin also checks for other issues such as API compatibility, package versioning, and bundle start order. Reference: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/implementing/developing/aem-project-content-package-structure.html?lang=en#build-analyzer-maven-plugin https://github.com/adobe/aemanalyser-maven-plugin


by Kattie at Jun 18, 2024, 08:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E134 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rhea
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the developer who wrote this is scratching their head, wondering why no one can figure it out. Option B it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
3 months ago
Hold on, is that a typo in the file name? 'languageServicelmplefgjson'? Sounds like someone needs to clean up their code a bit.
upvoted 0 times
Deane
1 months ago
I think Option B might be a better choice, it seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
1 months ago
Option A looks like the snippet to use for reading the OSGi configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 months ago
I agree, it's important to have clean and organized code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
1 months ago
Agreed, Option A seems like the right choice for reading the configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
2 months ago
Yeah, that file name looks like a mess. Definitely needs some cleaning up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
I think Option A is the snippet the developer should use to read the OSGi configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 months ago
Yeah, that file name looks like a mess. Definitely needs some cleaning up.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margot
3 months ago
I don't know, Option A seems more robust. It handles the configuration file as a string and uses Gson to parse it.
upvoted 0 times
Corrinne
2 months ago
Both options have their merits. It depends on the specific requirements of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
2 months ago
I think Option B might be simpler to implement. It directly reads the configuration file as a resource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
2 months ago
I agree, Option A looks like the better choice. Gson is a reliable library for parsing JSON.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elly
3 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. It's more concise and easier to read the configuration file.
upvoted 0 times
Karl
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
2 months ago
Yes, Option B is definitely the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
2 months ago
I agree, Option B seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yen
4 months ago
That's a good point, Zita. Option B does seem to offer more customization. It's a tough choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B is better as it provides more flexibility in reading the OSGi configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
4 months ago
I think the developer should use Option A because it seems to be simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel