New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E134 Exam - Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E134 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E134 Questions]

AMS recommends a learn to upgrade AEM servers with In-place Upgrade because the existing version has reached EOL

What are two disadvantages of performing an In-place Upgrade to the latest version of AEM? (Select two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Backward Compatibility with the previous AEM Version is out of scope for the Pattern Detector tool, while doing an AEM upgrade. The Pattern Detector tool is a tool that scans an existing AEM code base and identifies patterns that are incompatible with AEM as a Cloud Service or newer versions of AEM on-premise. The tool does not check for backward compatibility with older versions of AEM, as this is not a requirement for upgrading. Reference: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/moving/cloud-migration/pattern-detector.html?lang=en https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/moving/cloud-migration/pattern-detector/patterns-detected.html?lang=en


by Izetta at Mar 05, 2024, 05:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E134 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lindy
3 months ago
E sounds complicated, is it really that bad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
3 months ago
D is a big issue too, losing ACLs can mess everything up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
3 months ago
Wait, are you serious? C is a must for every upgrade, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
4 months ago
Totally agree, B can take forever if the versions are far apart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
4 months ago
A is definitely a downside, losing revision history is rough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
I feel like I read that the developer setup can get pretty complex during an in-place upgrade, but I can't remember if that's a disadvantage or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
4 months ago
Content revision history not being preserved sounds familiar, but I also recall something about needing to migrate content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the upgrade process can be really lengthy depending on how far apart the versions are.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
I remember discussing that in-place upgrades can sometimes lead to loss of ACLs, users, and groups, which is a big concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
5 months ago
No problem, I've got this. In-place upgrades can be risky, so I'll focus on the two most critical disadvantages - content revision history and the upgrade process complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
5 months ago
Whoa, this is a lot to consider. I'm a bit unsure about the specifics of content migration and ACL preservation. I'll need to review the details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I've dealt with AEM upgrades before, so I think I have a good handle on the potential challenges. I'll make sure to weigh the time and complexity factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key disadvantages seem to be around content and user data - I'll need to make sure I understand the implications of those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the pros and cons of an in-place upgrade to the latest AEM version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options to understand the exact effect of the "erase preserve-management" command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about where the deployer configurations are merged, so I need to focus on the deployment process and where those configurations would end up. I believe the local directory for the app is the correct answer, but I'll double-check my understanding just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to automate the process for repeat accounts, so I'm going to go with option B. An Apex trigger to set up a new opportunity revenue schedule sounds like the best way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
10 months ago
Haha, I love how they try to sugarcoat it with 'In-place Upgrade.' Sounds more like 'In-place Headache' to me. But hey, at least it's not as bad as the time I had to migrate a legacy system from COBOL to Java. Now that was a real nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
10 months ago
Whoa, hold up! Content migration required? That's not good. And what's this about a long and arduous process? Sounds like a real test of endurance. Though, I guess if the existing version is at EOL, we don't have much choice. Guess I'll just have to strap in and get ready for the ride.
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
8 months ago
C: True, but sometimes we just have to bite the bullet and upgrade to keep things running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
9 months ago
B: Tell me about it. And the whole process can take forever, depending on how big the version gap is.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
9 months ago
A: Yeah, content migration can be a pain. It's definitely one of the downsides of in-place upgrades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
10 months ago
Ah, I see. Well, at least we don't have to worry about losing our ACLs, users, and groups. That would be a real headache. But B and E definitely sound like the biggest drawbacks. I wonder if they have a secret 'Upgrade-O-Matic 3000' that can make this process a breeze?
upvoted 0 times
Lucina
8 months ago
I wonder if they have a secret 'Upgrade-O-Matic 3000' that can make this process a breeze?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
8 months ago
Ah, I see. Well, at least we don't have to worry about losing our ACLs, users, and groups. That would be a real headache. But B and E definitely sound like the biggest drawbacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
9 months ago
C) Content Migration is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
9 months ago
A) Content revision history Is not preserved.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashanti
11 months ago
But option B is also important. Depending on the version difference, the upgrade process can be really time-consuming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
11 months ago
I agree with Justine. Losing content revision history and ACLs, users, and groups can be a major drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
11 months ago
Hmm, I think B and E are definitely the disadvantages here. Upgrading between major versions can be a real pain, and the setup and automation required can be a nightmare. I've heard horror stories about content revision history loss, but I guess that's not the case here.
upvoted 0 times
Sueann
10 months ago
Definitely, losing ACLs, users, and groups would be a major drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
10 months ago
It's a relief that content revision history is preserved in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
10 months ago
Yes, the complex developer setup and automation needed for the upgrade can be quite challenging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
10 months ago
I agree, upgrading between major versions can be a long and arduous process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
11 months ago
I think option A and D are the disadvantages of performing an In-place Upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel