Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E134 Exam - Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

AMS recommends a learn to upgrade AEM servers with In-place Upgrade because the existing version has reached EOLWhat are two disadvantages of performing an In-place Upgrade to the latest version of AEM? (Select two.)
B) Depending on the version difference between the old and new instances, the upgrade can be a long and arduous process.
A) Content revision history Is not preserved.
C) Content Migration is required.
D) ACLs, users, and groups are lost.
E) Complex developer setup and automation of the upgrade process.

Adobe AD0-E134 Exam - Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E134 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E134 Questions]

AMS recommends a learn to upgrade AEM servers with In-place Upgrade because the existing version has reached EOL

What are two disadvantages of performing an In-place Upgrade to the latest version of AEM? (Select two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Backward Compatibility with the previous AEM Version is out of scope for the Pattern Detector tool, while doing an AEM upgrade. The Pattern Detector tool is a tool that scans an existing AEM code base and identifies patterns that are incompatible with AEM as a Cloud Service or newer versions of AEM on-premise. The tool does not check for backward compatibility with older versions of AEM, as this is not a requirement for upgrading. Reference: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/moving/cloud-migration/pattern-detector.html?lang=en https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/moving/cloud-migration/pattern-detector/patterns-detected.html?lang=en


by Izetta at Mar 05, 2024, 05:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E134 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lindy
8 months ago
E sounds complicated, is it really that bad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
8 months ago
D is a big issue too, losing ACLs can mess everything up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
8 months ago
Wait, are you serious? C is a must for every upgrade, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
9 months ago
Totally agree, B can take forever if the versions are far apart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
9 months ago
A is definitely a downside, losing revision history is rough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
9 months ago
I feel like I read that the developer setup can get pretty complex during an in-place upgrade, but I can't remember if that's a disadvantage or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
9 months ago
Content revision history not being preserved sounds familiar, but I also recall something about needing to migrate content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the upgrade process can be really lengthy depending on how far apart the versions are.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
10 months ago
I remember discussing that in-place upgrades can sometimes lead to loss of ACLs, users, and groups, which is a big concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
10 months ago
No problem, I've got this. In-place upgrades can be risky, so I'll focus on the two most critical disadvantages - content revision history and the upgrade process complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
10 months ago
Whoa, this is a lot to consider. I'm a bit unsure about the specifics of content migration and ACL preservation. I'll need to review the details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
10 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I've dealt with AEM upgrades before, so I think I have a good handle on the potential challenges. I'll make sure to weigh the time and complexity factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
10 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key disadvantages seem to be around content and user data - I'll need to make sure I understand the implications of those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the pros and cons of an in-place upgrade to the latest AEM version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
10 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options to understand the exact effect of the "erase preserve-management" command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about where the deployer configurations are merged, so I need to focus on the deployment process and where those configurations would end up. I believe the local directory for the app is the correct answer, but I'll double-check my understanding just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to automate the process for repeat accounts, so I'm going to go with option B. An Apex trigger to set up a new opportunity revenue schedule sounds like the best way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 year ago
Haha, I love how they try to sugarcoat it with 'In-place Upgrade.' Sounds more like 'In-place Headache' to me. But hey, at least it's not as bad as the time I had to migrate a legacy system from COBOL to Java. Now that was a real nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
1 year ago
Whoa, hold up! Content migration required? That's not good. And what's this about a long and arduous process? Sounds like a real test of endurance. Though, I guess if the existing version is at EOL, we don't have much choice. Guess I'll just have to strap in and get ready for the ride.
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
1 year ago
C: True, but sometimes we just have to bite the bullet and upgrade to keep things running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
B: Tell me about it. And the whole process can take forever, depending on how big the version gap is.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 year ago
A: Yeah, content migration can be a pain. It's definitely one of the downsides of in-place upgrades.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
1 year ago
Ah, I see. Well, at least we don't have to worry about losing our ACLs, users, and groups. That would be a real headache. But B and E definitely sound like the biggest drawbacks. I wonder if they have a secret 'Upgrade-O-Matic 3000' that can make this process a breeze?
upvoted 0 times
Lucina
1 year ago
I wonder if they have a secret 'Upgrade-O-Matic 3000' that can make this process a breeze?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
1 year ago
Ah, I see. Well, at least we don't have to worry about losing our ACLs, users, and groups. That would be a real headache. But B and E definitely sound like the biggest drawbacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
1 year ago
C) Content Migration is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
1 year ago
A) Content revision history Is not preserved.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashanti
1 year ago
But option B is also important. Depending on the version difference, the upgrade process can be really time-consuming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
1 year ago
I agree with Justine. Losing content revision history and ACLs, users, and groups can be a major drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
1 year ago
Hmm, I think B and E are definitely the disadvantages here. Upgrading between major versions can be a real pain, and the setup and automation required can be a nightmare. I've heard horror stories about content revision history loss, but I guess that's not the case here.
upvoted 0 times
Sueann
1 year ago
Definitely, losing ACLs, users, and groups would be a major drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
1 year ago
It's a relief that content revision history is preserved in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
1 year ago
Yes, the complex developer setup and automation needed for the upgrade can be quite challenging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
1 year ago
I agree, upgrading between major versions can be a long and arduous process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
1 year ago
I think option A and D are the disadvantages of performing an In-place Upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel