Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe Exam AD0-E121 Topic 6 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E121 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 6
[All AD0-E121 Questions]

A customer has been using the AEM ContextHub feature Cut wants to extend it by adding an additional API. The additional API will be used to allow digital marketers to target banners based on CRM data for the current visit.

What should the Business Practitioner recommend that the customer create?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Mayra at Aug 26, 2024, 07:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E121 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Trina
11 months ago
C is the way to go, no doubt about it. The customer wants to target banners based on CRM data, and a custom persisted store is perfect for that. Easy peasy lemon squeezy!
upvoted 0 times
Filiberto
9 months ago
I see, but a custom persisted store would provide better functionality for targeting banners based on CRM data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
9 months ago
B) A custom session store candidate
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
9 months ago
Actually, a custom persisted store would be more suitable for this specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
A) A ContextHub UI module
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
10 months ago
That makes sense, a custom persisted store would indeed be the best choice for targeting banners based on CRM data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
10 months ago
C) A custom persisted store candidate
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
11 months ago
I think a ContextHub UI module might be a good choice too, as it could provide a user-friendly interface for managing the additional API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 months ago
I believe a custom session store candidate could also work well in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
11 months ago
I agree with Roselle, a custom persisted store candidate would be the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
11 months ago
D, definitely D! ISONP is the way to go, it's like the Fonzie of store candidates - cool, confident, and gets the job done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. B or C could both work, but I'm leaning towards C since we want to persist the CRM data across sessions.
upvoted 0 times
Steffanie
10 months ago
I agree, C would be the most suitable choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
10 months ago
Agreed, C would be the most suitable choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
10 months ago
I think C is the best option for persisting the CRM data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
11 months ago
I think C is the best option for persisting the CRM data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roselle
11 months ago
I think the Business Practitioner should recommend creating a custom persisted store candidate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
11 months ago
I think the answer is C. A custom persisted store candidate seems like the best option to extend the ContextHub functionality and integrate CRM data.
upvoted 0 times
Nida
11 months ago
C: Yes, a custom persisted store candidate would allow digital marketers to target banners based on CRM data for the current visit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
B: I agree, a custom persisted store candidate would be the most suitable choice for adding the additional API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
11 months ago
A: I think the answer is C. A custom persisted store candidate seems like the best option to extend the ContextHub functionality and integrate CRM data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel