Adobe Exam AD0-E121 Topic 5 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E121 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 5

A developer plans to use the Text component on its pages. However the out-of-the-box (OOTB) Tex! component does not allow authors to edit HTML source on the component. How should the developer support HTML source editing?

AExtend the COTB Text component and enable the sourceedit Rkh-Text Editor (RTE) plugm.

BCreate a new clientlib to programmatically handle HTML source >n authoring.

CCreate a standalone custom Text component and handle HTML source in Sightly.

DEdit the OOTB Text component directly to enable sourceedit Rich-Text Editor (RTE) plugin.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Cherry at May 04, 2022, 12:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E121 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Marvel

9 days ago

I think Option A is the best choice for maintaining compatibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jade

14 days ago

Definitely leaning towards Option C for a clean solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannetta

20 days ago

Surprised that editing the OOTB component directly (Option D) is even an option!

upvoted 0 times

...

Anisha

25 days ago

I disagree, creating a new clientlib (Option B) gives more flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alpha

1 month ago

Option A seems like the most straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

1 month ago

I think the answer is A - "none". Excluding log messages means you don't want to see any of them, so the logging priority should be set to none.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

1 month ago

I've got this one! The product owner's main job is to optimize value for the business, so the answer has to be B. Keeping stakeholders at bay or directing the developers are not their primary responsibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vinnie

1 month ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is A. Sensitivity label is what determines access control in a mandatory access control (MAC) environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willis

1 month ago

Okay, I've got this. The question says the results were presented as a ratio of the cost required to produce a 1 mcg/l decrease in cholesterol levels. That's a classic cost-effectiveness analysis, where you're looking at the cost per unit of clinical benefit. I'm confident this is the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...